Texas Jackrabbit League B-1 + 123 (F-26) | Division Standings

Texas Jackrabbit League B-1 + 123 (F-26) Division Standings

Fall 2026 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 30

The race right now

The gap is down to 33 points after second place gained 5 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSStandings points	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile23-5 lines · 66.8% L5 +36+36+30+22+31	222+31	23-582.1%	66.8%286-142 games	—	L5 +36+36+30+22+31
Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 100.0% · Lines 4–5: 57.1% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (57.1%)7 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-0100.0%69-20 games · +49 diff. Line 26-0100.0%74-26 games · +48 diff. Line 35-271.4%73-43 games · +30 diff. Line 44-357.1%70-53 games · +17 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJohnalynn Leiboviich · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Carrie Schultz · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Tiffany Nuche · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↑ 1	Memorial Northwest-Blue Angels20-8 lines · 58.3% L5 +28+29+22+28+36	189+36	20-871.4%	58.3%288-206 games	—	L5 +28+29+22+28+36
Memorial Northwest-Blue Angels · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 71.4% · Lines 4–5: 85.7% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (57.1%)7 recorded team matches · 33 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-271.4%72-42 games · +30 diff. Line 25-271.4%73-47 games · +26 diff. Line 34-357.1%63-62 games · +1 diff. Line 46-185.7%80-55 games · +25 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsPat Ganther · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Melissa AndrewsCC · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Terry Szajna · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls19-9 lines · 59.6% L5 +36+22+23+14+30	183+30	19-967.9%	59.6%280-190 games	—	L5 +36+22+23+14+30
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 61.5% · Lines 4–5: 83.3% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (42.9%)7 recorded team matches · 39 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-442.9%72-56 games · +16 diff. Line 25-183.3%59-40 games · +19 diff. Line 34-357.1%79-60 games · +19 diff. Line 45-183.3%65-29 games · +36 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJanet Beckman · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Tina Battle · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Kellie Johnson · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 2	Champions Place-Lucky Strings19-9 lines · 55.9% L5 +12+31+36+28+17	180+17	19-967.9%	55.9%255-201 games	—	L5 +12+31+36+28+17
Champions Place-Lucky Strings · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 69.2% · Lines 4–5: 60.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (60.0%)7 recorded team matches · 42 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-271.4%59-58 games · +1 diff. Line 24-266.7%58-48 games · +10 diff. Line 36-185.7%63-57 games · +6 diff. Line 43-260.0%56-35 games · +21 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKatee DoughertyC · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Roberta Klvac · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Diane O'Brien · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Hearthstone CC-Stoners14-14 lines · 49.9% L5 +36+4+23+20+4	145+4	14-1450.0%	49.9%262-263 games	—	L5 +36+4+23+20+4
Hearthstone CC-Stoners · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 57.1% · Lines 4–5: 42.9% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (42.9%)7 recorded team matches · 77 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-271.4%74-62 games · +12 diff. Line 23-442.9%71-71 games · 0 diff. Line 33-442.9%58-64 games · -6 diff. Line 43-442.9%59-66 games · -7 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsTracy Jarvis · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Candace Freed · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Alli White · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↑ 2	Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias11-17 lines · 42.9% L5 0+20+31+12+24	115+24	11-1739.3%	42.9%205-273 games	—	L5 0+20+31+12+24
Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 14.3% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 107 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%60-67 games · -7 diff. Line 22-340.0%39-54 games · -15 diff. Line 33-442.9%52-63 games · -11 diff. Line 41-614.3%46-77 games · -31 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDee D'Alessandro · 1-5 on Lines 4–5Mary Styla · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Liz Tackett · 0-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 1	Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court11-17 lines · 47.4% L5 +36+21+6+18+6	103+6	11-1739.3%	47.4%237-263 games	—	L5 +36+21+6+18+6
Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.5% · Lines 4–5: 71.4% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 119 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-433.3%55-55 games · 0 diff. Line 23-442.9%66-71 games · -5 diff. Line 31-614.3%50-72 games · -22 diff. Line 45-271.4%66-65 games · +1 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLaNeva Nugent · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Tina Courville · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Johanna Sumner · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8↑ 1	Woodlands CC-Simply Smashing11-17 lines · 47.1% L5 +6+19+14+11+36	102+36	11-1739.3%	47.1%238-267 games	—	L5 +6+19+14+11+36
Woodlands CC-Simply Smashing · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 21.4% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 120 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-614.3%40-76 games · -36 diff. Line 22-528.6%59-69 games · -10 diff. Line 34-357.1%70-59 games · +11 diff. Line 44-266.7%69-51 games · +18 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsNancy Oesterling · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Kathy Wentzler · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Elaine Gerber · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9↓ 2	Coles Crossing-Chaos10-18 lines · 44.5% L5 +3+12+8+30+8	102+8	10-1835.7%	44.5%223-278 games	—	L5 +3+12+8+30+8
Coles Crossing-Chaos · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 28.6% · Lines 4–5: 14.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 120 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-442.9%59-60 games · -1 diff. Line 21-614.3%43-74 games · -31 diff. Line 35-271.4%67-61 games · +6 diff. Line 41-614.3%54-83 games · -29 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLaura TeperaCC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Ashley Holbert · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Renate Wheeler · 0-4 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Carlton Woods-Court Jesters2-26 lines · 27.6% L5 0+12+3+80	23	2-267.1%	27.6%118-309 games	—	L5 0+12+3+80
Carlton Woods-Court Jesters · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 7.7% · Lines 4–5: 14.3% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 199 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-70.0%20-84 games · -64 diff. Line 21-516.7%27-69 games · -42 diff. Line 30-70.0%44-78 games · -34 diff. Line 41-614.3%27-78 games · -51 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsHolly Mullin · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Laura Schneider · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Shylah Craig · 0-5 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 6

Memorial Northwest-Blue AngelsvsCarlton Woods-Served with a Smile

No. 2 meets No. 1, separated by 33 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 7-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 5-2 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Woodlands CC-Simply SmashingvsColes Crossing-Chaos

No. 8 meets No. 9, separated by 0 points. Winning 3 of 4 lines would break the points tie, with other totals unchanged.

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 5-2 this season. Home: Line 3 is 4-3 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Champions Place-Lucky StringsvsHearthstone CC-Stoners

No. 4 meets No. 5, separated by 35 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 5-2 this season. Home: Line 1 is 5-2 across 7 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchMemorial Northwest-Blue Angels lines won

Memorial Northwest-Blue Angels 2, Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile	222	+2	224
Memorial Northwest-Blue Angels	189	+2	191
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls	183	+0	183
Champions Place-Lucky Strings	180	+0	180
Hearthstone CC-Stoners	145	+0	145
Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias	115	+0	115
Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court	103	+0	103
Coles Crossing-Chaos	102	+0	102
Woodlands CC-Simply Smashing	102	+0	102
Carlton Woods-Court Jesters	23	+0	23

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 30

Biggest Upset

Line 3

Oct 30Line 3

Super TB [10-7]

Coles Crossing-ChaosUPSET WIN

Katie Elsbury

1176 Elo

Aly Gillette

1201 Elo

6 - 43 - 6[10 - 7]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls

Christy Drickamer

1216 Elo

Jessica Lemmons

1200 Elo

Match context for Coles Crossing-Chaos and Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
Coles Crossing-Chaos	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
47%	Pre-match win chance	53%
+15	Pair rating change	-15

Rating details

Match context for Coles Crossing-Chaos and Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
Coles Crossing-Chaos	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 8 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 30Line 1

Coles Crossing-Chaos

Laura Tepera

1203 Elo

Susan Price

1182 Elo

1 - 63 - 6

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash GirlsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Shannon Broadbent

1215 Elo

Erin Holmes

1226 Elo

Match context for Coles Crossing-Chaos and Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
Coles Crossing-Chaos	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
46%	Pre-match win chance	54%
-18	Pair rating change	+18

Rating details

Match context for Coles Crossing-Chaos and Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
Coles Crossing-Chaos	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 30 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls is 39 points behind first.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 4

Oct 30Line 4

Super TB [9-11]

Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile

Millie Fitzpatrick

1200 Elo

Johnalynn Leiboviich

1218 Elo

6 - 43 - 6[9 - 11]

Match Tiebreak

Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the CourtUPSET WIN

Tina Courville

1201 Elo

LaNeva Nugent

1207 Elo

Match context for Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile and Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court
Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile	Metric	Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court
51%	Pre-match win chance	49%
-14	Pair rating change	+14

Rating details

Match context for Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile and Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court
Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile	Metric	Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 6 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 3

Oct 30Line 3

Super TB [3-10]

Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias

Breadstick 6-1

Liz Marshall

1173 Elo

Laura Prejean

1191 Elo

6 - 12 - 6[3 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Champions Place-Lucky StringsWIN

Nancy Petrucciani

1199 Elo

Laura Sugg

1213 Elo

Match context for Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias and Champions Place-Lucky Strings
Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias	Metric	Champions Place-Lucky Strings
46%	Pre-match win chance	54%
-13	Pair rating change	+13

Rating details

Match context for Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias and Champions Place-Lucky Strings
Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias	Metric	Champions Place-Lucky Strings
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 17 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4
Carlton Woods-Served with a Smile	100%6-0	100%6-0	71%5-2	57%4-3
Memorial Northwest-Blue Angels	71%5-2	71%5-2	57%4-3	86%6-1
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Smash Girls	43%3-4	83%5-1	57%4-3	83%5-1
Champions Place-Lucky Strings	71%5-2	67%4-2	86%6-1	60%3-2
Hearthstone CC-Stoners	71%5-2	43%3-4	43%3-4	43%3-4
Magnolia @High Meadow Ranch-Steel Magnolias	57%4-3	40%2-3	43%3-4	14%1-6
Lakewood Residents Club-CU on the Court	33%2-4	43%3-4	14%1-6	71%5-2
Woodlands CC-Simply Smashing	14%1-6	29%2-5	57%4-3	67%4-2
Coles Crossing-Chaos	43%3-4	14%1-6	71%5-2	14%1-6
Carlton Woods-Court Jesters	0%0-7	17%1-5	0%0-7	14%1-6

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

Texas Jackrabbit League · Rulebook revised July 2026

Do forfeits have to start at line 4?

No. Jackrabbit explicitly does not require forfeiting from the bottom up. Do not apply another league's bottom-up rule.

Rule 9.3, p. 6

Can we forfeit all four lines?

No. All-four-line forfeits or defaults are prohibited and can lead to next-season suspension. Notify the president and division head about special circumstances.

Rule 9.1, p. 6

Can we borrow a player from another team?

No. Only legal members of your own roster may play, with no substitutes from another team.

Rule 5.1, p. 3

All rules & FAQs