Texas Jackrabbit League Champions 1 + 123 (F-26) Tennis Standings

Houston · Fall 2026 · 10 teams

Results through Nov 6

The race right now

The gap is down to 38 points after second place gained 6 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSStandings points	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	WP Falconwing-Spin Sisters24-8 lines · 62.1% L5 +36+24+36+36+24	225+24	24-875.0%	62.1%307-187 games	—	L5 +36+24+36+36+24
WP Falconwing-Spin Sisters · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 81.3% · Lines 4–5: 83.3% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (66.7%)8 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-187.5%91-54 games · +37 diff. Line 26-275.0%89-42 games · +47 diff. Line 34-266.7%69-48 games · +21 diff. Line 45-183.3%58-43 games · +15 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsClaudia McFadden · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Lizeth Carrera · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Selme Finnie · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love18-14 lines · 52.6% L5 +23+12+21+23+30	187+30	18-1456.3%	52.6%309-278 games	—	L5 +23+12+21+23+30
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 68.8% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (42.9%)8 recorded team matches · 38 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-187.5%95-47 games · +48 diff. Line 24-450.0%77-76 games · +1 diff. Line 33-442.9%59-75 games · -16 diff. Line 44-450.0%69-68 games · +1 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLeslie SchamunCC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Heike Schmid · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Vikki Clove · 1-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls16-16 lines · 48.8% L5 +22+23+21+20+26	165+26	16-1650.0%	48.8%254-266 games	—	L5 +22+23+21+20+26
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 46.7% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (12.5%)8 recorded team matches · 60 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-185.7%77-35 games · +42 diff. Line 21-712.5%42-92 games · -50 diff. Line 35-271.4%67-64 games · +3 diff. Line 42-433.3%47-61 games · -14 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKrista Wall · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Andy Billeaud · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Lana Hornak · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 1	Woodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles17-14 lines · 54.2% L5 +25+18+14+18+14	161+14	17-1454.8%	54.2%287-243 games	—	L5 +25+18+14+18+14
Woodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 42.9% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (25.0%)8 recorded team matches · 64 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-266.7%69-41 games · +28 diff. Line 22-625.0%61-82 games · -21 diff. Line 36-275.0%89-61 games · +28 diff. Line 44-266.7%63-50 games · +13 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMissy PriceCC · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Maria Luisa Locht · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Tammy Conatser · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↑ 2	Woodlands CC-Unforced Terrors16-15 lines · 48.8% L5 +11+28+30+16+24	157+24	16-1551.6%	48.8%250-262 games	—	L5 +11+28+30+16+24
Woodlands CC-Unforced Terrors · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 68.8% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (0.0%)8 recorded team matches · 68 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%68-68 games · 0 diff. Line 26-275.0%79-58 games · +21 diff. Line 30-70.0%51-83 games · -32 diff. Line 42-250.0%40-41 games · -1 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDebbie Amundsen · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Andira Cook · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Colleen Spearman · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Love Hurts16-16 lines · 48.1% L5 0+30+22+19+17	150+17	16-1650.0%	48.1%273-294 games	—	L5 0+30+22+19+17
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Love Hurts · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 46.7% · Lines 4–5: 37.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (28.6%)8 recorded team matches · 75 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%61-68 games · -7 diff. Line 25-362.5%67-72 games · -5 diff. Line 35-362.5%77-71 games · +6 diff. Line 43-537.5%68-83 games · -15 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDeniece Kelley · 1-4 on Lines 4–5Seija Vilkki · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Cynthia Boase · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 2	Tomball-Well Seasoned16-16 lines · 47.2% L5 +36+8+16+18+9	144+9	16-1650.0%	47.2%264-295 games	—	L5 +36+8+16+18+9
Tomball-Well Seasoned · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 71.4% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (37.5%)8 recorded team matches · 81 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%52-82 games · -30 diff. Line 25-362.5%76-57 games · +19 diff. Line 33-537.5%72-84 games · -12 diff. Line 45-271.4%64-60 games · +4 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCristina Salazar · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Janan Karpiuk · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Nancy Hoffman · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill Hotshots15-17 lines · 49.8% L5 +16+3600+22	138+22	15-1746.9%	49.8%275-277 games	—	L5 +16+3600+22
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill Hotshots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 57.1% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (37.5%)8 recorded team matches · 87 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%65-83 games · -18 diff. Line 25-362.5%77-72 games · +5 diff. Line 33-442.9%62-67 games · -5 diff. Line 44-357.1%71-55 games · +16 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsEsther Davis · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Louise Juillard · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Seema Hede · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1&2-Sweet Lady Slicers15-17 lines · 51.0% L5 +17+9+18+36+18	133+18	15-1746.9%	51.0%264-254 games	—	L5 +17+9+18+36+18
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1&2-Sweet Lady Slicers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 25.0% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (12.5%)8 recorded team matches · 92 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-712.5%52-87 games · -35 diff. Line 23-537.5%59-67 games · -8 diff. Line 36-275.0%84-60 games · +24 diff. Line 43-350.0%57-40 games · +17 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAmy Suess · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Eunice Skehan · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Dawn Abt · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls6-26 lines · 38.9% L5 0+3+8+4+12	63+12	6-2618.8%	38.9%223-350 games	—	L5 0+3+8+4+12
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 18.8% · Lines 4–5: 12.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)8 recorded team matches · 162 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-80.0%32-97 games · -65 diff. Line 23-537.5%64-73 games · -9 diff. Line 32-625.0%69-86 games · -17 diff. Line 41-712.5%58-94 games · -36 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsRossana Navarro · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Melike Turan · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Carol Moran · 0-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 13

WP Falconwing-Spin SistersvsWoodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles

No. 1 meets No. 4, separated by 64 points.

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 6-2 this season. Home: Line 3 is 5-3 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 13

Woodlands Parks-Sawmill HotshotsvsTomball-Well Seasoned

No. 8 meets No. 7, separated by 6 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 5-3 this season. Home: Line 2 is 5-3 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 13

Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley GirlsvsWoodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1&2-Sweet Lady Slicers

No. 10 meets No. 9, separated by 70 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 6-2 this season. Home: Line 3 is 2-6 across 8 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchWP Falconwing-Spin Sisters lines won

WP Falconwing-Spin Sisters 2, Woodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
WP Falconwing-Spin Sisters	225	+2	227
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love	187	+0	187
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	165	+0	165
Woodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles	161	+2	163
Woodlands CC-Unforced Terrors	157	+0	157
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Love Hurts	150	+0	150
Tomball-Well Seasoned	144	+0	144
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill Hotshots	138	+0	138
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1&2-Sweet Lady Slicers	133	+0	133
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls	63	+0	63

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Nov 6

Biggest Upset

Line 2

Nov 6Line 2

Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls

Jenny Crews

1182 Elo

Adriana Daza

1216 Elo

5 - 71 - 6

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley GirlsUPSET WIN

Breadstick 6-1

Asiria Martinez

1165 Elo

Rossana Navarro

1167 Elo

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
55%	Pre-match win chance	45%
-20	Pair rating change	+20

Rating details

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 12 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Nov 6Line 1

Kluge Tennis Center-CowgirlsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Marsha Madhu

1226 Elo

Jennifer Scheps

1203 Elo

6 - 16 - 1

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls

Karen Harvie

1179 Elo

Kristin Slay

1201 Elo

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
54%	Pre-match win chance	46%
+19	Pair rating change	-19

Rating details

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 26 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls is 60 points behind first.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 3

Nov 6Line 3

Super TB [10-2]

Kluge Tennis Center-CowgirlsWIN

Deb DeMan

1181 Elo

Lana Hornak

1226 Elo

4 - 66 - 4[10 - 2]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls

Jill Rauchle

1163 Elo

Karoline Babakhani

1164 Elo

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
56%	Pre-match win chance	44%
+12	Pair rating change	-12

Rating details

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls and Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 26 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls is 60 points behind first.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 3

Nov 6Line 3

Super TB [10-5]

Tomball-Well SeasonedWIN

Daisy Bello

1216 Elo

Hebe Brooks

1216 Elo

4 - 67 - 5[10 - 5]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love

Heidi McKeever

1202 Elo

Angela Arnold

1206 Elo

Match context for Tomball-Well Seasoned and Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love
Tomball-Well Seasoned	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love
52%	Pre-match win chance	48%
+13	Pair rating change	-13

Rating details

Match context for Tomball-Well Seasoned and Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love
Tomball-Well Seasoned	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 9 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4
WP Falconwing-Spin Sisters	88%7-1	75%6-2	67%4-2	83%5-1
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-40-Love	88%7-1	50%4-4	43%3-4	50%4-4
Kluge Tennis Center-Cowgirls	86%6-1	13%1-7	71%5-2	33%2-4
Woodlands Parks-Harpers Landing-Southern Belles	67%4-2	25%2-6	75%6-2	67%4-2
Woodlands CC-Unforced Terrors	63%5-3	75%6-2	0%0-7	50%2-2
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Love Hurts	29%2-5	63%5-3	63%5-3	38%3-5
Tomball-Well Seasoned	38%3-5	63%5-3	38%3-5	71%5-2
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill Hotshots	38%3-5	63%5-3	43%3-4	57%4-3
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1&2-Sweet Lady Slicers	13%1-7	38%3-5	75%6-2	50%3-3
Woodlands Parks-Alden Bridge 1-2 -Volley Girls	0%0-8	38%3-5	25%2-6	13%1-7

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

Texas Jackrabbit League · Rulebook revised July 2026

Do forfeits have to start at line 4?

No. Jackrabbit explicitly does not require forfeiting from the bottom up. Do not apply another league's bottom-up rule.

Rule 9.3, p. 6

Can we forfeit all four lines?

No. All-four-line forfeits or defaults are prohibited and can lead to next-season suspension. Notify the president and division head about special circumstances.

Rule 9.1, p. 6

Can we borrow a player from another team?

No. Only legal members of your own roster may play, with no substitutes from another team.

Rule 5.1, p. 3

All league rules & FAQs