Texas Jackrabbit League Champions 2 + 123 (F-26) Tennis Standings

Houston · Fall 2026 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 30

The race right now

The lead grew by 6 this round, to 41 points. More

Rank	Team	PTSStandings points	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves22-6 lines · 68.3% L5 +30+30+15+36+36	212+36	22-678.6%	68.3%300-139 games	—	L5 +30+30+15+36+36
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 78.6% · Lines 4–5: 83.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (71.4%)7 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-185.7%80-27 games · +53 diff. Line 25-271.4%80-42 games · +38 diff. Line 35-271.4%77-42 games · +35 diff. Line 45-183.3%63-28 games · +35 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMadeline PotterC · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Meghan Skrien · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Kristen Byrnes · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↑ 1	Woodlands CC-Over Served18-10 lines · 58.9% L5 +29+26+18+36+30	171+30	18-1064.3%	58.9%277-193 games	—	L5 +29+26+18+36+30
Woodlands CC-Over Served · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 61.5% · Lines 4–5: 85.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 41 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-0100.0%68-22 games · +46 diff. Line 22-528.6%63-67 games · -4 diff. Line 33-442.9%67-62 games · +5 diff. Line 46-185.7%79-42 games · +37 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCharlotte Cloninger · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Rebecca Mills · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Kim Bowman · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↓ 1	Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN16-12 lines · 52.8% L5 +36+15+28+30+11	159+11	16-1257.1%	52.8%265-237 games	—	L5 +36+15+28+30+11
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 57.1% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (57.1%)7 recorded team matches · 53 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%59-59 games · 0 diff. Line 24-357.1%76-63 games · +13 diff. Line 34-357.1%72-59 games · +13 diff. Line 44-266.7%58-44 games · +14 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSuzan MarcinkovichC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Heather McKenzie · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Kimberlee CombsCC · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↑ 2	Woodlands Parks-Lakeside-Banger Sisters15-13 lines · 54.9% L5 +15+29+22+23+36	153+36	15-1353.6%	54.9%264-217 games	—	L5 +15+29+22+23+36
Woodlands Parks-Lakeside-Banger Sisters · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 57.1% · Lines 4–5: 42.9% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (42.9%)7 recorded team matches · 59 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-271.4%78-35 games · +43 diff. Line 23-442.9%74-51 games · +23 diff. Line 34-357.1%62-55 games · +7 diff. Line 43-442.9%50-76 games · -26 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKatie Sullivan · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Tesa MonroeCC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Carol Buonfiglio · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↑ 2	Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Wild Strings16-12 lines · 51.7% L5 +8+11+18+9+36	149+36	16-1257.1%	51.7%253-236 games	—	L5 +8+11+18+9+36
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Wild Strings · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 57.1% · Lines 4–5: 57.1% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (57.1%)7 recorded team matches · 63 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%58-55 games · +3 diff. Line 24-357.1%70-60 games · +10 diff. Line 34-357.1%56-70 games · -14 diff. Line 44-357.1%69-51 games · +18 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJeanne Houston · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Jeanne Rossi · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Michelle Cangas · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↑ 2	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables15-13 lines · 49.5% L5 +6+8+18+16+30	138+30	15-1353.6%	49.5%234-239 games	—	L5 +6+8+18+16+30
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 40.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 74 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%49-61 games · -12 diff. Line 25-271.4%67-72 games · -5 diff. Line 34-357.1%61-53 games · +8 diff. Line 42-340.0%45-53 games · -8 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAmy AtnippCC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Vanessa Krantzke · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Laura Niemiec · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 2	Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace14-14 lines · 44.6% L5 +36+30+26+19+8	135+8	14-1450.0%	44.6%224-278 games	—	L5 +36+30+26+19+8
Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 28.6% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 77 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-442.9%52-71 games · -19 diff. Line 24-357.1%56-73 games · -17 diff. Line 35-271.4%66-63 games · +3 diff. Line 42-528.6%50-71 games · -21 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsHollie McNeely · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Sheri BankstonCC · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Roxanne Solak · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8↓ 4	Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes13-15 lines · 50.6% L5 +24+12+24+230	133	13-1546.4%	50.6%240-234 games	—	L5 +24+12+24+230
Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 53.8% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (33.3%)7 recorded team matches · 79 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-350.0%46-54 games · -8 diff. Line 24-357.1%68-69 games · -1 diff. Line 34-357.1%71-56 games · +15 diff. Line 42-433.3%55-55 games · 0 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsTara Morgan · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Ashley Wacasey · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Nicole Countryman · 0-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Carlton Woods-Sets in the Woods8-20 lines · 38.3% L5 +11+36+1000	72	8-2028.6%	38.3%184-297 games	—	L5 +11+36+1000
Carlton Woods-Sets in the Woods · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 28.6% · Lines 4–5: 28.6% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 140 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-614.3%20-80 games · -60 diff. Line 23-442.9%56-73 games · -17 diff. Line 32-528.6%51-69 games · -18 diff. Line 42-528.6%57-75 games · -18 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAndria Cain · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Kelly Maxwell · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Denae Valverde · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Kluge Tennis Center-Tennis Addicts3-25 lines · 31.0% L5 +4+4+2000	39	3-2510.7%	31.0%139-310 games	—	L5 +4+4+2000
Kluge Tennis Center-Tennis Addicts · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 7.1% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 173 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-70.0%32-78 games · -46 diff. Line 21-614.3%44-84 games · -40 diff. Line 30-70.0%27-81 games · -54 diff. Line 42-433.3%36-67 games · -31 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLiz Bergh · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Linda Von Keitz · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Sabrina Wozniak-Jellison · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 6

Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough LovesvsWoodlands CC-Over Served

No. 1 meets No. 2, separated by 41 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 7-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 6-1 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUNvsWoodlands Parks-Lakeside-Banger Sisters

No. 3 meets No. 4, separated by 6 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 5-2 this season. Home: Line 1 is 4-3 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Wild StringsvsColes Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes

No. 5 meets No. 8, separated by 16 points.

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 4-3 this season. Home: Line 2 is 4-3 across 7 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchWoodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves lines won

Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves 2, Woodlands CC-Over Served 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves	212	+2	214
Woodlands CC-Over Served	171	+2	173
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	159	+0	159
Woodlands Parks-Lakeside-Banger Sisters	153	+0	153
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Wild Strings	149	+0	149
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables	138	+0	138
Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace	135	+0	135
Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes	133	+0	133
Carlton Woods-Sets in the Woods	72	+0	72
Kluge Tennis Center-Tennis Addicts	39	+0	39

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 30

Biggest Upset

Line 1

Oct 30Line 1

Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN

Karoline Fritz

1242 Elo

Rebecca Schneider

1235 Elo

1 - 61 - 6

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -UnmatchablesUPSET WIN

Breadstick 6-1

Lezlie Herm

1227 Elo

Chelsea Kendrick

1201 Elo

Match context for Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN and Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
53%	Pre-match win chance	47%
-22	Pair rating change	+22

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN and Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 30 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 30Line 1

Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes

Ashley Creech

1218 Elo

Tiffani Johnson

1249 Elo

0 - 63 - 6

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough LovesWIN

Bagel 6-0

Kelly Tarro

1246 Elo

Lauren Laborde

1228 Elo

Match context for Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes and Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves
Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves
49%	Pre-match win chance	51%
-20	Pair rating change	+20

Rating details

Match context for Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes and Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves
Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 36 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, 41 points separate the top two teams.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 3

Oct 30Line 3

Super TB [6-10]

Woodlands CC-Over Served

Jennie Hughes

1210 Elo

Paige Hammit

1193 Elo

6 - 76 - 4[6 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that aceUPSET WIN

Roxanne Solak

1216 Elo

Sharon Sanchez

1159 Elo

Match context for Woodlands CC-Over Served and Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace
Woodlands CC-Over Served	Metric	Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace
52%	Pre-match win chance	48%
-14	Pair rating change	+14

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands CC-Over Served and Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace
Woodlands CC-Over Served	Metric	Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 8 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 2

Oct 30Line 2

Super TB [6-10]

Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN

Gin Stradley

1201 Elo

Jennifer Domilise

1199 Elo

6 - 76 - 4[6 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -UnmatchablesWIN

Vanessa Krantzke

1199 Elo

Brenda Rouch

1218 Elo

Match context for Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN and Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
49%	Pre-match win chance	51%
-14	Pair rating change	+14

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN and Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 30 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-Tough Loves	86%6-1	71%5-2	71%5-2	83%5-1
Woodlands CC-Over Served	100%6-0	29%2-5	43%3-4	86%6-1
Woodlands Park-Wendtwoods-TONS OF FUN	57%4-3	57%4-3	57%4-3	67%4-2
Woodlands Parks-Lakeside-Banger Sisters	71%5-2	43%3-4	57%4-3	43%3-4
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Wild Strings	57%4-3	57%4-3	57%4-3	57%4-3
Woodlands Parks-Sawmill -Unmatchables	29%2-5	71%5-2	57%4-3	40%2-3
Fairfield Athletic Club-It's all about that ace	43%3-4	57%4-3	71%5-2	29%2-5
Coles Crossing-Bubbles,Balls and Babes	50%3-3	57%4-3	57%4-3	33%2-4
Carlton Woods-Sets in the Woods	14%1-6	43%3-4	29%2-5	29%2-5
Kluge Tennis Center-Tennis Addicts	0%0-7	14%1-6	0%0-7	33%2-4

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

Texas Jackrabbit League · Rulebook revised July 2026

Do forfeits have to start at line 4?

No. Jackrabbit explicitly does not require forfeiting from the bottom up. Do not apply another league's bottom-up rule.

Rule 9.3, p. 6

Can we forfeit all four lines?

No. All-four-line forfeits or defaults are prohibited and can lead to next-season suspension. Notify the president and division head about special circumstances.

Rule 9.1, p. 6

Can we borrow a player from another team?

No. Only legal members of your own roster may play, with no substitutes from another team.

Rule 5.1, p. 3

All league rules & FAQs