Texas Jackrabbit League Open 1 + 123 (F-26) | Division Standings

Texas Jackrabbit League Open 1 + 123 (F-26) Division Standings

Fall 2026 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 30

The race right now

The gap is down to 8 points after second place gained 8 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSStandings points	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF20-8 lines · 58.7% L5 +28+24+36+24+28	190+28	20-871.4%	58.7%256-180 games	—	L5 +28+24+36+24+28
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 71.4% · Lines 4–5: 40.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (40.0%)7 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-442.9%63-63 games · 0 diff. Line 27-0100.0%80-41 games · +39 diff. Line 35-183.3%69-41 games · +28 diff. Line 42-340.0%44-35 games · +9 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsVanessa Johnson · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Jenny Hammond · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Emily Middleton · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↑ 1	Tomball-Hey18-10 lines · 57.9% L5 +23+22+30+30+36	182+36	18-1064.3%	57.9%231-168 games	—	L5 +23+22+30+30+36
Tomball-Hey · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 72.7% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (50.0%)7 recorded team matches · 8 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-0100.0%62-42 games · +20 diff. Line 23-350.0%62-47 games · +15 diff. Line 34-357.1%76-58 games · +18 diff. Line 42-166.7%31-21 games · +10 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDe EricksonC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Allison Brooks · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Meredith Williams · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Sweet Shots18-10 lines · 56.3% L5 +30+24+30+12+36	170+36	18-1064.3%	56.3%216-168 games	—	L5 +30+24+30+12+36
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Sweet Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 66.7% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (50.0%)7 recorded team matches · 20 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-350.0%51-49 games · +2 diff. Line 25-183.3%60-37 games · +23 diff. Line 35-271.4%71-52 games · +19 diff. Line 42-250.0%34-30 games · +4 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsValeria VizcardoC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Chloe Perez · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Rachel Wilson · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 2	Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets18-10 lines · 48.5% L5 +17+30+36+31+12	168+12	18-1064.3%	48.5%214-227 games	—	L5 +17+30+36+31+12
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 61.5% · Lines 4–5: 25.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (25.0%)7 recorded team matches · 22 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-266.7%49-50 games · -1 diff. Line 24-357.1%63-61 games · +2 diff. Line 35-271.4%68-64 games · +4 diff. Line 41-325.0%25-43 games · -18 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsNayiver Leger · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Eleonora Tonti · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Hannah Wu · 0-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces15-13 lines · 56.6% L5 +23+18+15+28+16	144+16	15-1353.6%	56.6%223-171 games	—	L5 +23+18+15+28+16
Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 57.1% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (50.0%)7 recorded team matches · 46 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%70-41 games · +29 diff. Line 24-357.1%68-56 games · +12 diff. Line 33-260.0%45-40 games · +5 diff. Line 42-250.0%37-34 games · +3 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLea Squires · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Ashley Odneal · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Katherine Determann · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung14-14 lines · 48.0% L5 +20+21+24+14+9	137+9	14-1450.0%	48.0%178-193 games	—	L5 +20+21+24+14+9
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.5% · Lines 4–5: 100.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 53 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%48-68 games · -20 diff. Line 23-350.0%43-53 games · -10 diff. Line 32-433.3%54-55 games · -1 diff. Line 42-0100.0%24-8 games · +16 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCatherine RowleyC · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Lisa Herbert · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Cecilia Hadad · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7	Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas13-15 lines · 52.9% L5 +36+15+5+6+20	127+20	13-1546.4%	52.9%255-227 games	—	L5 +36+15+5+6+20
Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 63 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-180.0%60-33 games · +27 diff. Line 22-528.6%59-69 games · -10 diff. Line 33-442.9%70-62 games · +8 diff. Line 44-266.7%59-51 games · +8 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMelinda Lehmann · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Nina Brown · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Darci Marsh · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing11-17 lines · 45.6% L5 +10+10+8+8+30	101+30	11-1739.3%	45.6%181-216 games	—	L5 +10+10+8+8+30
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 25.0% · Lines 4–5: 75.0% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (16.7%)7 recorded team matches · 89 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-433.3%47-55 games · -8 diff. Line 21-516.7%37-64 games · -27 diff. Line 33-350.0%56-61 games · -5 diff. Line 43-175.0%41-33 games · +8 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKathy Hibbison · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Lory Barnhill · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Laurie Douglas · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Gleannloch Farms-The Boneyard7-21 lines · 37.0% L5 +1+190+280	70	7-2125.0%	37.0%126-215 games	—	L5 +1+190+280
Gleannloch Farms-The Boneyard · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 33.3% · Lines 4–5: 0.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 120 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-516.7%35-63 games · -28 diff. Line 23-350.0%44-58 games · -14 diff. Line 32-433.3%28-62 games · -34 diff. Line 40-30.0%19-32 games · -13 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLena LahaskyC · 0-2 on Lines 4–5Leslie Dearing · 0-2 on Lines 4–5Kayla Towle · 0-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Lakes of Avalon Village-Got Skeels6-22 lines · 34.9% L5 +14+23+6+60	61	6-2221.4%	34.9%133-248 games	—	L5 +14+23+6+60
Lakes of Avalon Village-Got Skeels · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 11.1% · Lines 4–5: 40.0% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 129 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-233.3%15-36 games · -21 diff. Line 20-60.0%43-73 games · -30 diff. Line 30-70.0%37-79 games · -42 diff. Line 42-340.0%26-53 games · -27 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDaryl Hall · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Ali DeLuca · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Sue Burdette · 0-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 6

Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIFvsTomball-Hey

No. 1 meets No. 2, separated by 8 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 7-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 3-4 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin RitasvsWoodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing

No. 7 meets No. 8, separated by 26 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 4-3 this season. Home: Line 3 is 3-4 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Lakes of Avalon Village-Got SkeelsvsWoodlands CC- Skinny Aces

No. 10 meets No. 5, separated by 83 points.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchWoodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF lines won

Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF 2, Tomball-Hey 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF	190	+2	192
Tomball-Hey	182	+2	184
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Sweet Shots	170	+0	170
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets	168	+0	168
Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces	144	+0	144
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	137	+0	137
Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas	127	+0	127
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing	101	+0	101
Gleannloch Farms-The Boneyard	70	+0	70
Lakes of Avalon Village-Got Skeels	61	+0	61

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 30

Biggest Upset

Line 3

Oct 30Line 3

Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung

Evelyn Gerner

1183 Elo

Yolanda Levington

1240 Elo

4 - 65 - 7

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright SmashingUPSET WIN

Carine Berthiaux

1191 Elo

Nikki Grygar

1176 Elo

Match context for Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung and Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
54%	Pre-match win chance	46%
-19	Pair rating change	+19

Rating details

Match context for Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung and Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 30 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 2

Oct 30Line 2

Super TB [10-12]

Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung

Federica Armanini

1216 Elo

Cecilia Hadad

1210 Elo

6 - 41 - 6[10 - 12]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright SmashingUPSET WIN

Breadstick 6-1

Nicole O'Brien

1191 Elo

Vallerie Principi

1185 Elo

Match context for Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung and Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
54%	Pre-match win chance	46%
-15	Pair rating change	+15

Rating details

Match context for Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung and Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 30 points taken in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 1

Oct 30Line 1

Super TB [10-4]

Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String CourtetsWIN

Heather Lai

1243 Elo

Paige Phuong

1223 Elo

4 - 66 - 4[10 - 4]

Match Tiebreak

Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF

Julie Aichinger

1226 Elo

Emily Middleton

1221 Elo

Match context for Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets and Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF
51%	Pre-match win chance	49%
+14	Pair rating change	-14

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets and Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 12 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 4

Oct 30Line 4

Woodlands CC- Skinny AcesUPSET WIN

Vicky Wroten

1190 Elo

Ashley Odneal

1200 Elo

6 - 47 - 5

Straight Sets

Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas

Melinda Lehmann

1199 Elo

Darci Marsh

1218 Elo

Match context for Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces and Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas
Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces	Metric	Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas
48%	Pre-match win chance	52%
+18	Pair rating change	-18

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces and Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas
Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces	Metric	Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 16 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4
Woodlands Parks-Ridgewood-TGIF	43%3-4	100%7-0	83%5-1	40%2-3
Tomball-Hey	100%5-0	50%3-3	57%4-3	67%2-1
Woodlands Parks-Cranebrook-Sweet Shots	50%3-3	83%5-1	71%5-2	50%2-2
Woodlands Parks-Terramont-String Courtets	67%4-2	57%4-3	71%5-2	25%1-3
Woodlands CC- Skinny Aces	57%4-3	57%4-3	60%3-2	50%2-2
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Highly Strung	29%2-5	50%3-3	33%2-4	100%2-0
Spring Creek Oaks-Rockin Ritas	80%4-1	29%2-5	43%3-4	67%4-2
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 6-8-Downright Smashing	33%2-4	17%1-5	50%3-3	75%3-1
Gleannloch Farms-The Boneyard	17%1-5	50%3-3	33%2-4	0%0-3
Lakes of Avalon Village-Got Skeels	33%1-2	0%0-6	0%0-7	40%2-3

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

Texas Jackrabbit League · Rulebook revised July 2026

Do forfeits have to start at line 4?

No. Jackrabbit explicitly does not require forfeiting from the bottom up. Do not apply another league's bottom-up rule.

Rule 9.3, p. 6

Can we forfeit all four lines?

No. All-four-line forfeits or defaults are prohibited and can lead to next-season suspension. Notify the president and division head about special circumstances.

Rule 9.1, p. 6

Can we borrow a player from another team?

No. Only legal members of your own roster may play, with no substitutes from another team.

Rule 5.1, p. 3

All rules & FAQs