Texas Jackrabbit League Open 2 + 123 (F-26) | Division Standings

Texas Jackrabbit League Open 2 + 123 (F-26) Division Standings

Fall 2026 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 30

The race right now

The gap is down to 41 points after second place gained 17 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSStandings points	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love21-7 lines · 58.0% L5 +30+26+36+23+11	198+11	21-775.0%	58.0%287-208 games	—	L5 +30+26+36+23+11
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 78.6% · Lines 4–5: 57.1% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (57.1%)7 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-185.7%76-42 games · +34 diff. Line 25-271.4%79-54 games · +25 diff. Line 36-185.7%71-56 games · +15 diff. Line 44-357.1%61-56 games · +5 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBeth Dauzat · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Viktoria Mategrano · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Robin Wright · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Good Gets15-13 lines · 52.1% L5 +36+15+24+14+28	157+28	15-1353.6%	52.1%252-232 games	—	L5 +36+15+24+14+28
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Good Gets · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 71.4% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 41 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%79-46 games · +33 diff. Line 26-185.7%71-61 games · +10 diff. Line 32-528.6%57-71 games · -14 diff. Line 43-350.0%45-54 games · -9 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCarmen Gonzalez · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Ivette Pons · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Karina Macouzet · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3	Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out15-9 lines · 55.2% L5 +6+36+30+30+23	149+23	15-962.5%	55.2%237-192 games	—	L5 +6+36+30+30+23
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 66.7% · Lines 4–5: 40.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (40.0%)6 recorded team matches · 49 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-266.7%66-53 games · +13 diff. Line 24-266.7%59-49 games · +10 diff. Line 35-183.3%71-38 games · +33 diff. Line 42-340.0%41-52 games · -11 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBeverly Fahlstrom · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Karla Medrano · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Carol Davis · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild16-8 lines · 51.2% L5 +36+20+10+29+26	145+26	16-866.7%	51.2%212-202 games	—	L5 +36+20+10+29+26
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 58.3% · Lines 4–5: 60.0% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (50.0%)6 recorded team matches · 53 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-266.7%62-49 games · +13 diff. Line 23-350.0%52-56 games · -4 diff. Line 34-0100.0%44-38 games · +6 diff. Line 43-260.0%44-48 games · -4 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKim Nguyen · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Emily Pham · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Lien GoralskiC · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↑ 2	Fall Creek Faux Pros13-15 lines · 52.2% L5 +22+31+16+6+30	130+30	13-1546.4%	52.2%244-223 games	—	L5 +22+31+16+6+30
Fall Creek Faux Pros · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 53.8% · Lines 4–5: 60.0% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 68 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-350.0%50-55 games · -5 diff. Line 24-357.1%71-61 games · +10 diff. Line 31-614.3%62-70 games · -8 diff. Line 43-260.0%52-28 games · +24 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsYukiko Oneil · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Jill Stofa · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Eileen Radcliffe · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↓ 1	Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots12-16 lines · 49.9% L5 +18+23+9+30+15	129+15	12-1642.9%	49.9%237-238 games	—	L5 +18+23+9+30+15
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 35.7% · Lines 4–5: 20.0% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 69 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%71-70 games · +1 diff. Line 21-614.3%67-53 games · +14 diff. Line 33-260.0%49-44 games · +5 diff. Line 41-420.0%30-57 games · -27 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKristina Harris · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Kristina Otterstrom · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Erin Baker · 0-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 1	Northampton-Group Therapy13-15 lines · 46.3% L5 +4+28+14+16+8	112+8	13-1546.4%	46.3%222-258 games	—	L5 +4+28+14+16+8
Northampton-Group Therapy · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 28.6% · Lines 4–5: 60.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 86 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-70.0%26-81 games · -55 diff. Line 24-357.1%71-67 games · +4 diff. Line 35-271.4%61-61 games · 0 diff. Line 43-260.0%57-40 games · +17 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBecky Dietz · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Robin Garonska · 1-0 on Lines 4–5Rowan Gordon · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine11-17 lines · 46.7% L5 +16+22+20+19+16	108+16	11-1739.3%	46.7%224-256 games	—	L5 +16+22+20+19+16
Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 42.9% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (28.6%)7 recorded team matches · 90 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%59-69 games · -10 diff. Line 24-357.1%60-60 games · 0 diff. Line 32-528.6%55-76 games · -21 diff. Line 43-350.0%50-51 games · -1 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBetsy Hensley · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Deann Jahns · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Kristi Maires · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9↑ 1	Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports10-18 lines · 44.4% L5 +4+8+2+18+30	102+30	10-1835.7%	44.4%220-276 games	—	L5 +4+8+2+18+30
Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.5% · Lines 4–5: 57.1% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 96 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-350.0%45-55 games · -10 diff. Line 22-528.6%51-82 games · -31 diff. Line 30-60.0%48-62 games · -14 diff. Line 44-357.1%60-68 games · -8 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsThuy Tran · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Natalie Bevan · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Janet Smith · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10↓ 1	Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-Naranja10-18 lines · 44.3% L5 +8+15+26+10+8	95+8	10-1835.7%	44.3%196-246 games	—	L5 +8+15+26+10+8
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-Naranja · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 25.0% · Lines 4–5: 42.9% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (14.3%)7 recorded team matches · 103 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-340.0%30-44 games · -14 diff. Line 21-614.3%41-79 games · -38 diff. Line 33-350.0%55-57 games · -2 diff. Line 43-442.9%68-54 games · +14 diff. Line 50-0—0-0 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMarcela Villarreal · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Willemijn "Billy" Hageman · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Norma Lona · 1-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 6

Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-ShotsvsKluge Tennis Center-Win at Love

No. 6 meets No. 1, separated by 69 points.

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 6-1 this season. Home: Line 1 is 4-3 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green MachinevsWoodlands Parks-Tupelo-Naranja

No. 8 meets No. 10, separated by 13 points.

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 4-3 this season. Home: Line 3 is 2-5 across 7 recorded results.

Nov 6

Fall Creek Faux ProsvsWoodlands Parks-Tamarac-Good Gets

No. 5 meets No. 2, separated by 27 points.

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 6-1 this season. Home: Line 2 is 4-3 across 7 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchWoodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots lines won

Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots 2, Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	198	+2	200
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Good Gets	157	+0	157
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out	149	+0	149
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild	145	+0	145
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots	129	+2	131
Fall Creek Faux Pros	130	+0	130
Northampton-Group Therapy	112	+0	112
Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine	108	+0	108
Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports	102	+0	102
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-Naranja	95	+0	95

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 30

Biggest Upset

Line 4

Oct 30Line 4

Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out

Beverly Fahlstrom

1205 Elo

Karla Medrano

1198 Elo

5 - 74 - 6

Straight Sets

Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green MachineUPSET WIN

Kristi Maires

1174 Elo

Becca Oefinger

1185 Elo

Match context for Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out and Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine
53%	Pre-match win chance	47%
-18	Pair rating change	+18

Rating details

Match context for Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out and Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out	Metric	Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 16 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 30Line 1

Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love

Stephanie Bounds

1217 Elo

Monica Emerson

1251 Elo

1 - 66 - 7

Straight Sets

Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces WildUPSET WIN

Breadstick 6-1

Barbara Coumos

1236 Elo

Megan Vo

1227 Elo

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love and Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	Metric	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
50%	Pre-match win chance	50%
-19	Pair rating change	+19

Rating details

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love and Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	Metric	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 26 points taken in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 3

Oct 30Line 3

Super TB [7-10]

Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports

Ashley Raggio

1200 Elo

Hiroko Max

1192 Elo

6 - 76 - 2[7 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Northampton-Group TherapyWIN

Robin Garonska

1207 Elo

Rachael Bulman

1191 Elo

Match context for Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports and Northampton-Group Therapy
Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports	Metric	Northampton-Group Therapy
50%	Pre-match win chance	50%
-14	Pair rating change	+14

Rating details

Match context for Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports and Northampton-Group Therapy
Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports	Metric	Northampton-Group Therapy
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 8 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 4

Oct 30Line 4

Super TB [7-10]

Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love

Beth Dauzat

1197 Elo

Robin Wright

1200 Elo

3 - 66 - 3[7 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces WildWIN

Sarah Altus

1190 Elo

Kim Nguyen

1206 Elo

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love and Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	Metric	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
50%	Pre-match win chance	50%
-14	Pair rating change	+14

Rating details

Match context for Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love and Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	Metric	Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 26 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4
Kluge Tennis Center-Win at Love	86%6-1	71%5-2	86%6-1	57%4-3
Woodlands Parks-Tamarac-Good Gets	57%4-3	86%6-1	29%2-5	50%3-3
Woodlands Parks-Bear Branch 3-5All Strung Out	67%4-2	67%4-2	83%5-1	40%2-3
Kings Court Huber Ranch-Deuces Wild	67%4-2	50%3-3	100%4-0	60%3-2
Fall Creek Faux Pros	50%3-3	57%4-3	14%1-6	60%3-2
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-T-Shots	57%4-3	14%1-6	60%3-2	20%1-4
Northampton-Group Therapy	0%0-7	57%4-3	71%5-2	60%3-2
Woodlands Parks-Shadowbend-The Green Machine	29%2-5	57%4-3	29%2-5	50%3-3
Forest Oaks Swim & Racquet Club-Court Sports	50%3-3	29%2-5	0%0-6	57%4-3
Woodlands Parks-Tupelo-Naranja	40%2-3	14%1-6	50%3-3	43%3-4

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

Texas Jackrabbit League · Rulebook revised July 2026

Do forfeits have to start at line 4?

No. Jackrabbit explicitly does not require forfeiting from the bottom up. Do not apply another league's bottom-up rule.

Rule 9.3, p. 6

Can we forfeit all four lines?

No. All-four-line forfeits or defaults are prohibited and can lead to next-season suspension. Notify the president and division head about special circumstances.

Rule 9.1, p. 6

Can we borrow a player from another team?

No. Only legal members of your own roster may play, with no substitutes from another team.

Rule 5.1, p. 3

All rules & FAQs