WAIT Women’s A+ | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s A+ Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

The gap is down to 5.5 points after second place gained 0.5 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Maitland Tennis Club29-12 lines · 56.9% L5 +4+2.5+5+2+2.5	33.5+2.5	29-1270.7%	56.9%463-351 games	67.7#1	L5 +4+2.5+5+2+2.5
Maitland Tennis Club · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 76.5% · Lines 4–5: 71.4% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-0100.0%103-50 games · +53 diff. Line 25-455.6%88-79 games · +9 diff. Line 35-362.5%95-71 games · +24 diff. Line 46-366.7%99-71 games · +28 diff. Line 54-180.0%60-53 games · +7 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAmy Favero · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Maria Hale · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Elizabeth (Liz) McGlamery · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↑ 1	Sylvan Lake Barracudas23-17 lines · 53.8% L5 +4+2.5+2+3+3	28+3	23-1757.5%	53.8%455-390 games	50.8#3	L5 +4+2.5+2+3+3
Sylvan Lake Barracudas · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 56.3% · Lines 4–5: 46.2% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (40.0%)8 recorded team matches · 5.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%87-95 games · -8 diff. Line 25-362.5%94-79 games · +15 diff. Line 36-275.0%104-69 games · +35 diff. Line 44-450.0%93-73 games · +20 diff. Line 52-340.0%45-57 games · -12 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSherri Testa · 4-0 on Lines 4–5Sudha Yerneni · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Erin O'Donnell · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Sanlando Spice25-20 lines · 52.7% L5 +3+2.50+4+3	27.5+3	25-2055.6%	52.7%445-400 games	40.7#5	L5 +3+2.50+4+3
Sanlando Spice · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 66.7% · Lines 4–5: 38.5% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (20.0%)9 recorded team matches · 6 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-277.8%97-50 games · +47 diff. Line 25-455.6%96-99 games · -3 diff. Line 34-544.4%105-92 games · +13 diff. Line 44-450.0%78-78 games · 0 diff. Line 51-420.0%44-56 games · -12 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKristi McKenna · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Leslie Walden · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Margie Kachris · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 2	CCO Fireballs22-18 lines · 50.2% L5 +2+2.5+3+2+1	27+1	22-1855.0%	50.2%408-405 games	51.5#2	L5 +2+2.5+3+2+1
CCO Fireballs · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 73.3% · Lines 4–5: 45.5% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (25.0%)8 recorded team matches · 6.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-271.4%82-68 games · +14 diff. Line 26-275.0%99-81 games · +18 diff. Line 33-442.9%61-80 games · -19 diff. Line 42-625.0%80-105 games · -25 diff. Line 53-0100.0%38-20 games · +18 diff. Top lower-line contributorsRobin Mccaul · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Jenie Kolar · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Rebecca WilsonC · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Lake Nona Racquettes18-19 lines · 50.6% L5 +3+2.5+2+4+2.5	24.5+2.5	18-1948.6%	50.6%417-407 games	39.0#6	L5 +3+2.5+2+4+2.5
Lake Nona Racquettes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 73.3% · Lines 4–5: 30.8% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (20.0%)8 recorded team matches · 9 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-357.1%82-72 games · +10 diff. Line 27-187.5%105-64 games · +41 diff. Line 32-433.3%69-68 games · +1 diff. Line 43-537.5%66-88 games · -22 diff. Line 51-420.0%59-75 games · -16 diff. Top lower-line contributorsWendy Peeples · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Yardise Jones · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Cheryl Tolentino · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Red Bug Revolution19-21 lines · 49.2% L5 +1+2.5+3+1+3	24+3	19-2147.5%	49.2%437-451 games	34.8#8	L5 +1+2.5+3+1+3
Red Bug Revolution · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 37.5% · Lines 4–5: 61.5% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (12.5%)8 recorded team matches · 9.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%107-95 games · +12 diff. Line 21-712.5%70-102 games · -32 diff. Line 32-625.0%76-106 games · -30 diff. Line 45-271.4%83-64 games · +19 diff. Line 53-350.0%74-68 games · +6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAbigail (Abbie) McKinnon · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Marcia Rosman · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Kara Coggins · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7	Lake Cane Chaos20-25 lines · 49.7% L5 +1+2.5+3+3+2	22.5+2	20-2544.4%	49.7%474-479 games	43.9#4	L5 +1+2.5+3+3+2
Lake Cane Chaos · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 44.4% · Lines 4–5: 46.2% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (33.3%)9 recorded team matches · 11 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%110-91 games · +19 diff. Line 23-633.3%95-107 games · -12 diff. Line 35-455.6%99-103 games · -4 diff. Line 43-537.5%84-98 games · -14 diff. Line 53-260.0%58-52 games · +6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsPenny Watzka · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Carolynn Gilbert · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Mary Ann Koula · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Lake Cane Windermere Wild20-25 lines · 47.2% L5 +2+2.5+2+2+2	22.5+2	20-2544.4%	47.2%443-496 games	37.2#7	L5 +2+2.5+2+2+2
Lake Cane Windermere Wild · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 29.4% · Lines 4–5: 62.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (12.5%)9 recorded team matches · 11 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-712.5%55-95 games · -40 diff. Line 24-544.4%92-106 games · -14 diff. Line 34-357.1%67-74 games · -7 diff. Line 46-275.0%96-82 games · +14 diff. Line 54-450.0%96-89 games · +7 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSuzanne Simpson · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Jennie Caudill · 5-0 on Lines 4–5Shelly Kacergis · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Lake Cane Sweet Shots19-26 lines · 47.4% L5 +5+2.5+2+3+2	21.5+2	19-2642.2%	47.4%441-489 games	33.1#9	L5 +5+2.5+2+3+2
Lake Cane Sweet Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 27.8% · Lines 4–5: 50.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 12 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%65-109 games · -44 diff. Line 24-544.4%100-90 games · +10 diff. Line 35-455.6%99-98 games · +1 diff. Line 44-544.4%89-109 games · -20 diff. Line 54-357.1%76-76 games · 0 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDeidre Parker · 4-2 on Lines 4–5Kim DezavalaCC · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Rayer Headley · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Isleworth Ace Palomas16-28 lines · 43.6% L5 0+2.5+3+1+4	19+4	16-2836.4%	43.6%395-510 games	27.6#10	L5 0+2.5+3+1+4
Isleworth Ace Palomas · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 22.2% · Lines 4–5: 42.9% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 14.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%50-113 games · -63 diff. Line 23-633.3%76-108 games · -32 diff. Line 34-544.4%94-108 games · -14 diff. Line 44-544.4%101-101 games · 0 diff. Line 52-340.0%44-48 games · -4 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLisa Hilgenfeldt · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Jill Ata · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Jessica O'Brien · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Maitland Tennis ClubvsLake Cane Windermere Wild

No. 1 meets No. 8, separated by 11 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 4-1 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 6-3 this season. Home: Line 4 is 6-3 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

CCO FireballsvsLake Nona Racquettes

No. 4 meets No. 5, separated by 2.5 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 3-2 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 7-1 this season. Home: Line 2 is 6-2 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 4

Sanlando SpicevsRed Bug Revolution

No. 3 meets No. 6, separated by 3.5 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 4-1 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 6-2 this season. Home: Line 4 is 5-4 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchMaitland Tennis Club lines won

Maitland Tennis Club 3, Lake Cane Windermere Wild 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Maitland Tennis Club	33.5	+3	36.5
Sylvan Lake Barracudas	28	+0	28
Sanlando Spice	27.5	+0	27.5
CCO Fireballs	27	+0	27
Lake Cane Windermere Wild	22.5	+2	24.5
Lake Nona Racquettes	24.5	+0	24.5
Red Bug Revolution	24	+0	24
Lake Cane Chaos	22.5	+0	22.5
Lake Cane Sweet Shots	21.5	+0	21.5
Isleworth Ace Palomas	19	+0	19

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Lake Cane Sweet ShotsUPSET WIN

Bagel 6-0

Maisa Kingstone

1082 Elo

Amy Buck

1140 Elo

6 - 26 - 0

Straight Sets

Sanlando Spice

Kelli Forgione

1283 Elo

Karen Crane

1206 Elo

Match context for Lake Cane Sweet Shots and Sanlando Spice
Lake Cane Sweet Shots	Metric	Sanlando Spice
32%	Pre-match win chance	68%
+44	Pair rating change	-44

Rating details

Match context for Lake Cane Sweet Shots and Sanlando Spice
Lake Cane Sweet Shots	Metric	Sanlando Spice
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Isleworth Ace Palomas

Annette Horn

1088 Elo

Lisa Hilgenfeldt

1247 Elo

0 - 62 - 6

Straight Sets

CCO FireballsWIN

Bagel 6-0

Ivy Paffrath

1293 Elo

Katherine Pace

1161 Elo

Match context for Isleworth Ace Palomas and CCO Fireballs
Isleworth Ace Palomas	Metric	CCO Fireballs
42%	Pre-match win chance	58%
-26	Pair rating change	+26

Rating details

Match context for Isleworth Ace Palomas and CCO Fireballs
Isleworth Ace Palomas	Metric	CCO Fireballs
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

Isleworth Ace PalomasUPSET WIN

Bagel 6-0

Jill Ata

1132 Elo

Melissa Farrell

1101 Elo

6 - 04 - 66 - 4

Split Set

CCO Fireballs

Tina Harbert

1181 Elo

Carrie Evora

1227 Elo

Match context for Isleworth Ace Palomas and CCO Fireballs
Isleworth Ace Palomas	Metric	CCO Fireballs
38%	Pre-match win chance	62%
+22	Pair rating change	-34

Rating details

Match context for Isleworth Ace Palomas and CCO Fireballs
Isleworth Ace Palomas	Metric	CCO Fireballs
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 4 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Lake Cane Windermere Wild

Lata Chandra Morgan

1140 Elo

Kristine Neville

1209 Elo

4 - 66 - 35 - 7

Split Set

Sylvan Lake BarracudasWIN

Sudha Yerneni

1155 Elo

Kerry Ginas

1238 Elo

Match context for Lake Cane Windermere Wild and Sylvan Lake Barracudas
Lake Cane Windermere Wild	Metric	Sylvan Lake Barracudas
47%	Pre-match win chance	53%
-26	Pair rating change	+16

Rating details

Match context for Lake Cane Windermere Wild and Sylvan Lake Barracudas
Lake Cane Windermere Wild	Metric	Sylvan Lake Barracudas
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Sylvan Lake Barracudas is 5.5 points behind first.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Maitland Tennis Club	100%8-0	56%5-4	63%5-3	67%6-3	80%4-1
Sylvan Lake Barracudas	50%4-4	63%5-3	75%6-2	50%4-4	40%2-3
Sanlando Spice	78%7-2	56%5-4	44%4-5	50%4-4	20%1-4
CCO Fireballs	71%5-2	75%6-2	43%3-4	25%2-6	100%3-0
Lake Nona Racquettes	57%4-3	88%7-1	33%2-4	38%3-5	20%1-4
Red Bug Revolution	63%5-3	13%1-7	25%2-6	71%5-2	50%3-3
Lake Cane Chaos	56%5-4	33%3-6	56%5-4	38%3-5	60%3-2
Lake Cane Windermere Wild	13%1-7	44%4-5	57%4-3	75%6-2	50%4-4
Lake Cane Sweet Shots	11%1-8	44%4-5	56%5-4	44%4-5	57%4-3
Isleworth Ace Palomas	11%1-8	33%3-6	44%4-5	44%4-5	40%2-3

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs