WAIT Women’s A++ | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s A++ Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

First place is shared on 33 points. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Azalea Ace Kickers30-14 lines · 57.2% L5 +3+2.5+3+3+3.5	33+3.5	30-1468.2%	57.2%492-368 games	61.2#1	L5 +3+2.5+3+3+3.5
Azalea Ace Kickers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 88.2% · Lines 4–5: 58.8% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (44.4%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-0100.0%100-47 games · +53 diff. Line 27-277.8%105-48 games · +57 diff. Line 34-544.4%78-97 games · -19 diff. Line 46-275.0%105-76 games · +29 diff. Line 54-544.4%92-88 games · +4 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJanice Fisher · 5-2 on Lines 4–5Lauren Pennington · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Allison FryeC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Winter Park Balls on Fire30-14 lines · 54.7% L5 +2+2.5+3+3+5	33+5	30-1468.2%	54.7%485-401 games	58.5#2	L5 +2+2.5+3+3+5
Winter Park Balls on Fire · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 41.2% · Lines 4–5: 77.8% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%58-79 games · -21 diff. Line 24-544.4%91-84 games · +7 diff. Line 39-0100.0%117-65 games · +52 diff. Line 47-277.8%109-84 games · +25 diff. Line 57-277.8%110-89 games · +21 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSarah Cole · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Caroline Hopkins · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Elizabeth Corddry · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Sanlando Hope27-18 lines · 54.8% L5 +2+2.5+2+3+4	29.5+4	27-1860.0%	54.8%487-402 games	55.6#3	L5 +2+2.5+2+3+4
Sanlando Hope · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 72.2% · Lines 4–5: 53.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (42.9%)9 recorded team matches · 3.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-188.9%107-60 games · +47 diff. Line 25-455.6%95-88 games · +7 diff. Line 35-455.6%106-87 games · +19 diff. Line 45-362.5%91-71 games · +20 diff. Line 53-442.9%59-76 games · -17 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJill Civiero · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Sherolyn Reid · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Barbara Bahng · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↑ 1	Lake Cane Dare Doubles26-19 lines · 51.4% L5 +4+2.5+2+3+4	28.5+4	26-1957.8%	51.4%461-436 games	46.8#6	L5 +4+2.5+2+3+4
Lake Cane Dare Doubles · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 88.9% · Lines 4–5: 31.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (28.6%)9 recorded team matches · 4.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-277.8%100-72 games · +28 diff. Line 29-0100.0%118-79 games · +39 diff. Line 33-633.3%72-94 games · -22 diff. Line 43-633.3%84-96 games · -12 diff. Line 52-528.6%70-80 games · -10 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDianne Schaefer · 2-5 on Lines 4–5Kathleen Hansen · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Rochele Ogden · 1-5 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↑ 1	Lake Cane SW Smashers24-20 lines · 48.9% L5 +3+2.5+5+2+3	27+3	24-2054.5%	48.9%450-470 games	47.2#5	L5 +3+2.5+5+2+3
Lake Cane SW Smashers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 43.8% · Lines 4–5: 62.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 6 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%63-90 games · -27 diff. Line 24-450.0%101-93 games · +8 diff. Line 34-544.4%93-108 games · -15 diff. Line 45-362.5%87-88 games · -1 diff. Line 55-362.5%83-80 games · +3 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJen Carter · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Patricia Soler · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Rikki Myers · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↓ 3	Interlachen Country Club24-21 lines · 52.5% L5 +3+2.5+4+2+1	26.5+1	24-2153.3%	52.5%472-427 games	47.3#4	L5 +3+2.5+4+2+1
Interlachen Country Club · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 44.4% · Lines 4–5: 61.1% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (33.3%)9 recorded team matches · 6.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%91-69 games · +22 diff. Line 23-633.3%86-97 games · -11 diff. Line 35-455.6%92-97 games · -5 diff. Line 46-366.7%108-88 games · +20 diff. Line 55-455.6%95-76 games · +19 diff. Top lower-line contributorsPaige Gay · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Jayshri (Kookie) Desai · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Emily Elliott · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7	Sanlando Heat20-19 lines · 52.0% L5 +3+2.5+4+2+1.5	25.5+1.5	20-1951.3%	52.0%425-393 games	43.9#7	L5 +3+2.5+4+2+1.5
Sanlando Heat · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 46.2% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (28.6%)8 recorded team matches · 7.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%69-79 games · -10 diff. Line 25-271.4%76-62 games · +14 diff. Line 35-362.5%86-63 games · +23 diff. Line 44-450.0%88-80 games · +8 diff. Line 52-340.0%54-60 games · -6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsRichelle Hayes Cook · 4-0 on Lines 4–5Krissi Warren · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Paula Hall · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Heathrow Thumpers17-28 lines · 46.1% L5 +1+2.5+1+3+2	18.5−1 adj.+2	17-2837.8%	46.1%409-478 games	36.6#8	L5 +1+2.5+1+3+2
Heathrow Thumpers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 55.6% · Lines 4–5: 27.3% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (12.5%)9 recorded team matches · 14.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%100-84 games · +16 diff. Line 25-455.6%104-116 games · -12 diff. Line 34-544.4%97-107 games · -10 diff. Line 41-712.5%58-101 games · -43 diff. Line 52-166.7%28-22 games · +6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsStella Liu · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Jennifer Lomedico · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Caitlyn Martino · 1-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right13-32 lines · 43.7% L5 +2+2.5+1+2+1	15.5+1	13-3228.9%	43.7%346-446 games	18.1#9	L5 +2+2.5+1+2+1
Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 5.9% · Lines 4–5: 46.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 17.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%62-105 games · -43 diff. Line 20-80.0%56-105 games · -49 diff. Line 32-625.0%82-93 games · -11 diff. Line 44-450.0%78-79 games · -1 diff. Line 53-442.9%68-64 games · +4 diff. Top lower-line contributorsRobin Bradford · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Julie Wolszczak · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Missi DeMorat · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Winter Park Causin' a Racquet7-33 lines · 34.3% L5 +2+2.50+20	12	7-3317.5%	34.3%224-430 games	8.7#10	L5 +2+2.50+20
Winter Park Causin' a Racquet · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 0.0% · Lines 4–5: 15.4% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)8 recorded team matches · 21 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-80.0%32-97 games · -65 diff. Line 20-70.0%25-85 games · -60 diff. Line 32-528.6%83-95 games · -12 diff. Line 40-70.0%40-85 games · -45 diff. Line 52-433.3%44-68 games · -24 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAnne Balk · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Anne Hicks · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Melissa Putt · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Winter Park Balls on FirevsAzalea Ace Kickers

No. 2 meets No. 1, separated by 0 points. Winning 3 of 5 lines would break the points tie, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 8-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 3-5 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 4

Interlachen Country ClubvsLake Cane SW Smashers

No. 6 meets No. 5, separated by 0.5 points. Winning 3 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 5 is 6-3 this season. Home: Line 5 is 5-4 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Lake Cane Dare DoublesvsSanlando Hope

No. 4 meets No. 3, separated by 1 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 8-1 this season. Home: Line 1 is 7-2 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchWinter Park Balls on Fire lines won

Winter Park Balls on Fire 3, Azalea Ace Kickers 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Winter Park Balls on Fire	33	+3	36
Azalea Ace Kickers	33	+2	35
Sanlando Hope	29.5	+0	29.5
Lake Cane Dare Doubles	28.5	+0	28.5
Lake Cane SW Smashers	27	+0	27
Interlachen Country Club	26.5	+0	26.5
Sanlando Heat	25.5	+0	25.5
Heathrow Thumpers	18.5	+0	18.5
Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right	15.5	+0	15.5
Winter Park Causin' a Racquet	12	+0	12

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right

Robin Bradford

1222 Elo

Kathy Cotton

1211 Elo

0 - 64 - 6

Straight Sets

Lake Cane Dare DoublesUPSET WIN

Bagel 6-0

Rochele Ogden

1083 Elo

Dianne Schaefer

1103 Elo

Match context for Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right and Lake Cane Dare Doubles
Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right	Metric	Lake Cane Dare Doubles
67%	Pre-match win chance	33%
-66	Pair rating change	+44

Rating details

Match context for Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right and Lake Cane Dare Doubles
Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right	Metric	Lake Cane Dare Doubles
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 4 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

Azalea Ace KickersWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Lauren Pennington

1288 Elo

Janice Fisher

1244 Elo

6 - 16 - 1

Straight Sets

Sanlando Heat

April Wagner

1168 Elo

Sharon Burtner

1182 Elo

Match context for Azalea Ace Kickers and Sanlando Heat
Azalea Ace Kickers	Metric	Sanlando Heat
63%	Pre-match win chance	37%
+24	Pair rating change	-48

Rating details

Match context for Azalea Ace Kickers and Sanlando Heat
Azalea Ace Kickers	Metric	Sanlando Heat
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3.5 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, 0 points separate the top two teams.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 3

Oct 28Line 3

Azalea Ace KickersWIN

Allison Frye

1223 Elo

Shannon Hurley

1258 Elo

3 - 66 - 36 - 4

Split Set

Sanlando Heat

Sally Gardner

1177 Elo

Paula Hall

1255 Elo

Match context for Azalea Ace Kickers and Sanlando Heat
Azalea Ace Kickers	Metric	Sanlando Heat
54%	Pre-match win chance	46%
+16	Pair rating change	-26

Rating details

Match context for Azalea Ace Kickers and Sanlando Heat
Azalea Ace Kickers	Metric	Sanlando Heat
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3.5 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, 0 points separate the top two teams.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Super TB [5-10]

Lake Cane SW Smashers

Claire Fitzgerald

1212 Elo

Shery Cassidy

1168 Elo

6 - 77 - 5[5 - 10]

Match Tiebreak

Heathrow ThumpersUPSET WIN

Jean Schalk

1171 Elo

Becky Cusick

1187 Elo

Match context for Lake Cane SW Smashers and Heathrow Thumpers
Lake Cane SW Smashers	Metric	Heathrow Thumpers
52%	Pre-match win chance	48%
-28	Pair rating change	+18

Rating details

Match context for Lake Cane SW Smashers and Heathrow Thumpers
Lake Cane SW Smashers	Metric	Heathrow Thumpers
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Azalea Ace Kickers	100%8-0	78%7-2	44%4-5	75%6-2	44%4-5
Winter Park Balls on Fire	38%3-5	44%4-5	100%9-0	78%7-2	78%7-2
Sanlando Hope	89%8-1	56%5-4	56%5-4	63%5-3	43%3-4
Lake Cane Dare Doubles	78%7-2	100%9-0	33%3-6	33%3-6	29%2-5
Lake Cane SW Smashers	38%3-5	50%4-4	44%4-5	63%5-3	63%5-3
Interlachen Country Club	56%5-4	33%3-6	56%5-4	67%6-3	56%5-4
Sanlando Heat	29%2-5	71%5-2	63%5-3	50%4-4	40%2-3
Heathrow Thumpers	56%5-4	56%5-4	44%4-5	13%1-7	67%2-1
Ft. Gatlin Serves You Right	11%1-8	0%0-8	25%2-6	50%4-4	43%3-4
Winter Park Causin' a Racquet	0%0-8	0%0-7	29%2-5	0%0-7	33%2-4

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs