WAIT Women’s A1 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s A1 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

The lead grew by 1 this round, to 9 points. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Lake Cane Zesties39-6 lines · 60.4% L5 +4+2.5+5+4+4	41.5+4	39-686.7%	60.4%594-390 games	80.7#1	L5 +4+2.5+5+4+4
Lake Cane Zesties · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 72.2% · Lines 4–5: 100.0% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (66.7%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-366.7%104-68 games · +36 diff. Line 27-277.8%123-106 games · +17 diff. Line 38-188.9%127-93 games · +34 diff. Line 49-0100.0%114-53 games · +61 diff. Line 57-0100.0%101-61 games · +40 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSopit Kinakin · 7-0 on Lines 4–5Kristin Skolnik · 5-0 on Lines 4–5Mardy Goote · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Eastwood Extreme30-15 lines · 55.4% L5 +1+2.5+4+3+3	32.5+3	30-1566.7%	55.4%490-395 games	62.2#2	L5 +1+2.5+4+3+3
Eastwood Extreme · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 66.7% · Lines 4–5: 62.5% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 9 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-277.8%123-80 games · +43 diff. Line 25-455.6%95-84 games · +11 diff. Line 36-366.7%104-84 games · +20 diff. Line 45-362.5%80-74 games · +6 diff. Line 55-362.5%71-65 games · +6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLisa Meyer · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Maria Victoria Chiu · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Diane Mahony · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3	Sylvan Lake Hot Shots29-16 lines · 58.7% L5 +5+2.5+3+5+4	31.5+4	29-1664.4%	58.7%542-381 games	56.2#3	L5 +5+2.5+3+5+4
Sylvan Lake Hot Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.9% · Lines 4–5: 87.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (33.3%)9 recorded team matches · 10 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-633.3%86-101 games · -15 diff. Line 24-544.4%116-87 games · +29 diff. Line 37-277.8%122-73 games · +49 diff. Line 48-188.9%118-71 games · +47 diff. Line 56-185.7%79-32 games · +47 diff. Top lower-line contributorsWendy Eisenberg · 6-1 on Lines 4–5Allison Brandau · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Tracy Paone · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↑ 2	Heathrow Renegades20-25 lines · 46.7% L5 +2+2.5+2+2+3	22.5+3	20-2544.4%	46.7%449-513 games	36.4#5	L5 +2+2.5+2+2+3
Heathrow Renegades · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 33.3% · Lines 4–5: 56.3% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 19 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-722.2%67-107 games · -40 diff. Line 24-544.4%68-98 games · -30 diff. Line 33-633.3%88-100 games · -12 diff. Line 45-455.6%109-92 games · +17 diff. Line 54-357.1%91-93 games · -2 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAndrea Daniels · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Ivy Gilbert · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Keeley Solby · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↓ 1	Interlachen Country Club17-23 lines · 48.7% L5 +3+2.5+2+2+1	22+1	17-2342.5%	48.7%419-441 games	28.0#9	L5 +3+2.5+2+2+1
Interlachen Country Club · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 62.5% · Lines 4–5: 27.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (0.0%)8 recorded team matches · 19.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%88-91 games · -3 diff. Line 25-362.5%108-101 games · +7 diff. Line 33-537.5%78-81 games · -3 diff. Line 43-537.5%77-85 games · -8 diff. Line 50-30.0%33-40 games · -7 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMeigan Putnam · 2-0 on Lines 4–5Caroline Marshall · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Amanda Wilson · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↓ 1	Azalea Seay of Love16-24 lines · 45.5% L5 +3+2.5+30+1	21+1	16-2440.0%	45.5%368-440 games	29.2#8	L5 +3+2.5+30+1
Azalea Seay of Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 43.8% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (12.5%)8 recorded team matches · 20.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-275.0%84-52 games · +32 diff. Line 21-712.5%58-95 games · -37 diff. Line 32-528.6%56-85 games · -29 diff. Line 42-528.6%61-90 games · -29 diff. Line 53-537.5%87-102 games · -15 diff. Top lower-line contributorsShelly Bauer · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Rebeque Plante · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Melanie Webb · 1-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↑ 2	Azalea Aces18-27 lines · 47.2% L5 +1+2.5+1+2+4	20.5+4	18-2740.0%	47.2%426-476 games	37.8#4	L5 +1+2.5+1+2+4
Azalea Aces · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 44.4% · Lines 4–5: 30.8% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (25.0%)9 recorded team matches · 21 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%103-94 games · +9 diff. Line 23-633.3%87-100 games · -13 diff. Line 35-362.5%92-91 games · +1 diff. Line 42-625.0%65-94 games · -29 diff. Line 52-340.0%37-53 games · -16 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKathy McCreaC · 2-5 on Lines 4–5Samantha Renfrow · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Mary Harmening · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Red Bug Rebels18-27 lines · 45.7% L5 +2+2.5+2+1+2	20.5+2	18-2740.0%	45.7%431-513 games	34.7#6	L5 +2+2.5+2+1+2
Red Bug Rebels · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.9% · Lines 4–5: 26.7% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 21 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-633.3%60-89 games · -29 diff. Line 24-544.4%91-99 games · -8 diff. Line 36-366.7%116-109 games · +7 diff. Line 42-722.2%75-100 games · -25 diff. Line 52-433.3%63-75 games · -12 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKelly Bushey · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Ashley Pleasants · 1-4 on Lines 4–5Irene Kow · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9↓ 2	Red Bug Double Trouble18-27 lines · 47.2% L5 +4+2.5+3+3+1	20.5+1	18-2740.0%	47.2%398-445 games	31.3#7	L5 +4+2.5+3+3+1
Red Bug Double Trouble · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 61.1% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 21 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-544.4%94-97 games · -3 diff. Line 27-277.8%100-63 games · +37 diff. Line 31-811.1%74-115 games · -41 diff. Line 43-537.5%70-80 games · -10 diff. Line 52-528.6%50-68 games · -18 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSusan FerrellC · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Blanche Abou-jaoude · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Denise Lentz · 1-4 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Fort Gatlin Good Vibes10-25 lines · 41.2% L5 0+2.50+3+2	17.5+2	10-2528.6%	41.2%287-410 games	16.0#10	L5 0+2.50+3+2
Fort Gatlin Good Vibes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 35.7% · Lines 4–5: 18.2% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (0.0%)7 recorded team matches · 24 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-528.6%60-90 games · -30 diff. Line 23-442.9%72-85 games · -13 diff. Line 31-614.3%58-84 games · -26 diff. Line 42-528.6%47-77 games · -30 diff. Line 50-40.0%34-57 games · -23 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSandy George · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Melinda Barrett · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Angie Brooker · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Lake Cane ZestiesvsAzalea Seay of Love

No. 1 meets No. 6, separated by 20.5 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 4-1 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 6-2 this season. Home: Line 1 is 6-3 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Eastwood ExtremevsSylvan Lake Hot Shots

No. 2 meets No. 3, separated by 1 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 8-1 this season. Home: Line 4 is 6-3 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Red Bug Double TroublevsInterlachen Country Club

No. 9 meets No. 5, separated by 1.5 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 1-4 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 5-3 this season. Home: Line 1 is 4-5 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchLake Cane Zesties lines won

Lake Cane Zesties 3, Azalea Seay of Love 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Lake Cane Zesties	41.5	+3	44.5
Eastwood Extreme	32.5	+0	32.5
Sylvan Lake Hot Shots	31.5	+0	31.5
Azalea Seay of Love	21	+2	23
Heathrow Renegades	22.5	+0	22.5
Interlachen Country Club	22	+0	22
Azalea Aces	20.5	+0	20.5
Red Bug Double Trouble	20.5	+0	20.5
Red Bug Rebels	20.5	+0	20.5
Fort Gatlin Good Vibes	17.5	+0	17.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Red Bug RebelsUPSET WIN

Kirsten Hodgson

1184 Elo

Diane Giordano

1099 Elo

7 - 66 - 2

Straight Sets

Eastwood Extreme

Zesa Manhart

1199 Elo

Maria Victoria Chiu

1270 Elo

Match context for Red Bug Rebels and Eastwood Extreme
Red Bug Rebels	Metric	Eastwood Extreme
37%	Pre-match win chance	63%
+46	Pair rating change	-60

Rating details

Match context for Red Bug Rebels and Eastwood Extreme
Red Bug Rebels	Metric	Eastwood Extreme
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

Azalea Seay of LoveWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Wendy Ahl

1275 Elo

Lea Loflin

1210 Elo

6 - 16 - 2

Straight Sets

Azalea Aces

Stacey Brack

1148 Elo

Cari Reinhardt

1214 Elo

Match context for Azalea Seay of Love and Azalea Aces
Azalea Seay of Love	Metric	Azalea Aces
59%	Pre-match win chance	41%
+26	Pair rating change	-26

Rating details

Match context for Azalea Seay of Love and Azalea Aces
Azalea Seay of Love	Metric	Azalea Aces
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Heathrow RenegadesUPSET WIN

Andrea Daniels

1146 Elo

Keeley Solby

1153 Elo

4 - 66 - 47 - 5

Split Set

Fort Gatlin Good Vibes

Laura Norris

1168 Elo

Tina Bernhoft

1166 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Renegades and Fort Gatlin Good Vibes
Heathrow Renegades	Metric	Fort Gatlin Good Vibes
47%	Pre-match win chance	53%
+18	Pair rating change	-38

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Renegades and Fort Gatlin Good Vibes
Heathrow Renegades	Metric	Fort Gatlin Good Vibes
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 3

Oct 28Line 3

Red Bug RebelsUPSET WIN

Michelle Berganini

1089 Elo

Lisa Medla

1279 Elo

7 - 63 - 67 - 5

Split Set

Eastwood Extreme

Julie Phelps

1199 Elo

Marites Tandoc

1247 Elo

Match context for Red Bug Rebels and Eastwood Extreme
Red Bug Rebels	Metric	Eastwood Extreme
44%	Pre-match win chance	56%
+20	Pair rating change	-20

Rating details

Match context for Red Bug Rebels and Eastwood Extreme
Red Bug Rebels	Metric	Eastwood Extreme
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Lake Cane Zesties	67%6-3	78%7-2	89%8-1	100%9-0	100%7-0
Eastwood Extreme	78%7-2	56%5-4	67%6-3	63%5-3	63%5-3
Sylvan Lake Hot Shots	33%3-6	44%4-5	78%7-2	89%8-1	86%6-1
Heathrow Renegades	22%2-7	44%4-5	33%3-6	56%5-4	57%4-3
Interlachen Country Club	63%5-3	63%5-3	38%3-5	38%3-5	0%0-3
Azalea Seay of Love	75%6-2	13%1-7	29%2-5	29%2-5	38%3-5
Azalea Aces	56%5-4	33%3-6	63%5-3	25%2-6	40%2-3
Red Bug Rebels	33%3-6	44%4-5	67%6-3	22%2-7	33%2-4
Red Bug Double Trouble	44%4-5	78%7-2	11%1-8	38%3-5	29%2-5
Fort Gatlin Good Vibes	29%2-5	43%3-4	14%1-6	29%2-5	0%0-4

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs