WAIT Women’s A2 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s A2 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

The gap is down to 1 points after second place gained 1 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Golden Bear Racquettes35-10 lines · 62.2% L5 +4+2.5+4+5+3	37.5+3	35-1077.8%	62.2%546-332 games	67.8#1	L5 +4+2.5+4+5+3
Golden Bear Racquettes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 94.4% · Lines 4–5: 61.1% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (44.4%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 19-0100.0%115-40 games · +75 diff. Line 28-188.9%114-56 games · +58 diff. Line 37-277.8%114-61 games · +53 diff. Line 47-277.8%116-73 games · +43 diff. Line 54-544.4%87-102 games · -15 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMirlaine Mello · 6-1 on Lines 4–5Giovanna Aurichio · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Carla Rosa · 3-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Lake Highland Ladies34-11 lines · 60.0% L5 +2+2.5+5+4+4	36.5+4	34-1175.6%	60.0%529-352 games	59.2#4	L5 +2+2.5+5+4+4
Lake Highland Ladies · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 94.4% · Lines 4–5: 47.1% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (25.0%)9 recorded team matches · 1 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-188.9%111-55 games · +56 diff. Line 29-0100.0%114-53 games · +61 diff. Line 38-188.9%122-74 games · +48 diff. Line 46-366.7%111-71 games · +40 diff. Line 52-625.0%62-92 games · -30 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBrittany hotard · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Lisa Alpert · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Vicky GrowCC · 2-4 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3	Winter Park Advantage Us30-15 lines · 55.7% L5 +4+2.5+5+5+2	32.5+2	30-1566.7%	55.7%518-412 games	61.0#3	L5 +4+2.5+5+5+2
Winter Park Advantage Us · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 52.9% · Lines 4–5: 83.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (44.4%)9 recorded team matches · 5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%81-67 games · +14 diff. Line 24-544.4%112-115 games · -3 diff. Line 36-366.7%107-89 games · +18 diff. Line 47-277.8%106-79 games · +27 diff. Line 58-188.9%106-53 games · +53 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAlexandra Allen · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Dana Baumgarten · 4-0 on Lines 4–5Genna Simonds · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4	CCO Miss Hits30-15 lines · 54.0% L5 +3+2.5+3+5+3	32.5+3	30-1566.7%	54.0%508-433 games	63.3#2	L5 +3+2.5+3+5+3
CCO Miss Hits · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 72.2% · Lines 4–5: 55.6% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-277.8%103-67 games · +36 diff. Line 26-366.7%109-87 games · +22 diff. Line 37-277.8%109-89 games · +20 diff. Line 45-455.6%92-99 games · -7 diff. Line 55-455.6%95-91 games · +4 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMari Ball · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Kara Cox · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Mandy Chandler · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Lake Mary Finesse25-20 lines · 50.7% L5 +3+2.5+2+1+4	27.5+4	25-2055.6%	50.7%503-490 games	46.9#5	L5 +3+2.5+2+1+4
Lake Mary Finesse · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 44.4% · Lines 4–5: 70.6% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 10 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-722.2%80-107 games · -27 diff. Line 26-366.7%107-104 games · +3 diff. Line 35-455.6%125-118 games · +7 diff. Line 45-455.6%90-101 games · -11 diff. Line 57-187.5%95-52 games · +43 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJulie Demir · 4-0 on Lines 4–5Sharon Trad · 4-0 on Lines 4–5Terrie Uzel · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Sylvan Lake Sweet Shots17-27 lines · 46.4% L5 +1+2.500+2	20+2	17-2738.6%	46.4%420-485 games	32.9#7	L5 +1+2.500+2
Sylvan Lake Sweet Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 35.3% · Lines 4–5: 43.8% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (25.0%)9 recorded team matches · 17.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-544.4%95-111 games · -16 diff. Line 22-625.0%84-99 games · -15 diff. Line 32-625.0%52-82 games · -30 diff. Line 43-442.9%72-80 games · -8 diff. Line 54-544.4%99-104 games · -5 diff. Top lower-line contributorsGwen Dillman · 3-4 on Lines 4–5Stacie Hudgens · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Patricia Colloca Massot · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↑ 1	Red Bug Rave17-28 lines · 46.0% L5 +1+2.5+20+3	19.5+3	17-2837.8%	46.0%425-499 games	31.9#8	L5 +1+2.5+20+3
Red Bug Rave · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 41.2% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 18 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-625.0%66-92 games · -26 diff. Line 25-455.6%97-106 games · -9 diff. Line 33-633.3%77-105 games · -28 diff. Line 44-544.4%93-86 games · +7 diff. Line 52-722.2%83-104 games · -21 diff. Top lower-line contributorsTeri Blais · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Michelle Feinberg · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Shauna Allen · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8↓ 1	Genesis Brave16-29 lines · 44.6% L5 +2+2.5+3+4+2	18.5+2	16-2935.6%	44.6%421-523 games	35.5#6	L5 +2+2.5+3+4+2
Genesis Brave · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 35.3% · Lines 4–5: 38.9% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (33.3%)9 recorded team matches · 19 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-633.3%79-115 games · -36 diff. Line 23-537.5%82-97 games · -15 diff. Line 33-633.3%94-108 games · -14 diff. Line 43-633.3%79-98 games · -19 diff. Line 54-544.4%84-99 games · -15 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAnne Marie Lundequam · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Marnie SweeneyCC · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Valerie Larifla · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Fort Gatlin Double Down14-30 lines · 43.8% L5 +5+2.5+10+1	17+1	14-3031.8%	43.8%386-495 games	25.9#9	L5 +5+2.5+10+1
Fort Gatlin Double Down · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 27.8% · Lines 4–5: 33.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 20.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-544.4%66-92 games · -26 diff. Line 21-811.1%68-108 games · -40 diff. Line 33-537.5%77-84 games · -7 diff. Line 42-625.0%70-96 games · -26 diff. Line 53-442.9%84-88 games · -4 diff. Top lower-line contributorsDawn Briggs · 2-4 on Lines 4–5Kimberlee Strong · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Angie Kantor · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Lake Cane Smash6-39 lines · 36.1% L5 0+2.50+1+1	8.5+1	6-3913.3%	36.1%306-541 games	8.0#10	L5 0+2.50+1+1
Lake Cane Smash · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 0.0% · Lines 4–5: 29.4% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 29 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-90.0%72-122 games · -50 diff. Line 20-90.0%58-120 games · -62 diff. Line 30-90.0%50-117 games · -67 diff. Line 41-712.5%46-92 games · -46 diff. Line 54-544.4%80-90 games · -10 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAllison BolanovichC · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Melissa Trickett · 2-1 on Lines 4–5Melissa Hinson · 1-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Genesis BravevsGolden Bear Racquettes

No. 8 meets No. 1, separated by 19 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 0-5 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 9-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 3-6 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Fort Gatlin Double DownvsSylvan Lake Sweet Shots

No. 9 meets No. 6, separated by 3 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 1.5-3.5 points (home-away).

Nov 4

Winter Park Advantage UsvsLake Mary Finesse

No. 3 meets No. 5, separated by 5 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 5 is 7-2 this season. Home: Line 5 is 8-1 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchGenesis Brave lines won

Genesis Brave 3, Golden Bear Racquettes 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Golden Bear Racquettes	37.5	+2	39.5
Lake Highland Ladies	36.5	+0	36.5
CCO Miss Hits	32.5	+0	32.5
Winter Park Advantage Us	32.5	+0	32.5
Lake Mary Finesse	27.5	+0	27.5
Genesis Brave	18.5	+3	21.5
Sylvan Lake Sweet Shots	20	+0	20
Red Bug Rave	19.5	+0	19.5
Fort Gatlin Double Down	17	+0	17
Lake Cane Smash	8.5	+0	8.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Lake Highland Ladies

Lisa Alpert

1265 Elo

Brandy Kim

1237 Elo

4 - 62 - 6

Straight Sets

Lake Cane SmashUPSET WIN

Bethany Traylor

1084 Elo

Van French

1098 Elo

Match context for Lake Highland Ladies and Lake Cane Smash
Lake Highland Ladies	Metric	Lake Cane Smash
72%	Pre-match win chance	28%
-52	Pair rating change	+34

Rating details

Match context for Lake Highland Ladies and Lake Cane Smash
Lake Highland Ladies	Metric	Lake Cane Smash
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

CCO Miss HitsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Fallon Crofoot

1265 Elo

Jessica Dudley

1180 Elo

3 - 66 - 16 - 2

Split Set

Genesis Brave

Isabelle Welsh

1159 Elo

Juliana Ochoa

1120 Elo

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
62%	Pre-match win chance	38%
+14	Pair rating change	-14

Rating details

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 3

Oct 28Line 3

CCO Miss HitsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Mandy Chandler

1232 Elo

Megan Dennis

1171 Elo

6 - 46 - 76 - 1

Split Set

Genesis Brave

Kelly McAlister

1153 Elo

Thelma Laqui

1135 Elo

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
58%	Pre-match win chance	42%
+22	Pair rating change	-22

Rating details

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

Super TB [10-8]

CCO Miss HitsWIN

Kara Cox

1177 Elo

Mari Ball

1254 Elo

7 - 62 - 6[10 - 8]

Match Tiebreak

Genesis Brave

Valerie Larifla

1191 Elo

Anne Marie Lundequam

1221 Elo

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
51%	Pre-match win chance	49%
+18	Pair rating change	-18

Rating details

Match context for CCO Miss Hits and Genesis Brave
CCO Miss Hits	Metric	Genesis Brave
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Golden Bear Racquettes	100%9-0	89%8-1	78%7-2	78%7-2	44%4-5
Lake Highland Ladies	89%8-1	100%9-0	89%8-1	67%6-3	25%2-6
Winter Park Advantage Us	63%5-3	44%4-5	67%6-3	78%7-2	89%8-1
CCO Miss Hits	78%7-2	67%6-3	78%7-2	56%5-4	56%5-4
Lake Mary Finesse	22%2-7	67%6-3	56%5-4	56%5-4	88%7-1
Sylvan Lake Sweet Shots	44%4-5	25%2-6	25%2-6	43%3-4	44%4-5
Red Bug Rave	25%2-6	56%5-4	33%3-6	44%4-5	22%2-7
Genesis Brave	33%3-6	38%3-5	33%3-6	33%3-6	44%4-5
Fort Gatlin Double Down	44%4-5	11%1-8	38%3-5	25%2-6	43%3-4
Lake Cane Smash	0%0-9	0%0-9	0%0-9	13%1-7	44%4-5

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs