WAIT Women’s A3 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s A3 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

First place is shared on 31.5 points. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Heathrow Overserved29-16 lines · 55.7% L5 +5+2.5+4+2+4	31.5+4	29-1664.4%	55.7%526-419 games	56.9#2	L5 +5+2.5+4+2+4
Heathrow Overserved · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 64.7% · Lines 4–5: 55.6% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-188.9%107-69 games · +38 diff. Line 23-537.5%86-93 games · -7 diff. Line 38-188.9%118-69 games · +49 diff. Line 45-455.6%103-94 games · +9 diff. Line 55-455.6%109-94 games · +15 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCecilia McClure · 4-4 on Lines 4–5Kara Everly · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Anne Rue · 2-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Lake Nona Livewires29-16 lines · 54.0% L5 +3+2.5+3+4+4	31.5+4	29-1664.4%	54.0%514-438 games	58.1#1	L5 +3+2.5+3+4+4
Lake Nona Livewires · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 58.8% · Lines 4–5: 76.5% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%64-82 games · -18 diff. Line 27-277.8%106-84 games · +22 diff. Line 36-366.7%115-92 games · +23 diff. Line 47-277.8%112-85 games · +27 diff. Line 56-275.0%98-70 games · +28 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLynne Erickson · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Charise Scharfeld · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Sally McMahan · 5-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↑ 1	Sanlando Chargers26-19 lines · 52.6% L5 +3+2.5+4+3+4	28.5+4	26-1957.8%	52.6%492-444 games	52.3#3	L5 +3+2.5+4+3+4
Sanlando Chargers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 66.7% · Lines 4–5: 61.1% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 3 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 18-188.9%123-85 games · +38 diff. Line 24-544.4%91-89 games · +2 diff. Line 33-537.5%74-88 games · -14 diff. Line 44-544.4%95-101 games · -6 diff. Line 57-277.8%101-72 games · +29 diff. Top lower-line contributorsZhiyi Zhou · 6-1 on Lines 4–5Ning Xu · 6-1 on Lines 4–5Carol Muscato · 2-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 1	Isleworth Court Crushers23-17 lines · 51.2% L5 +2+2.5+2+2+2.5	28+2.5	23-1757.5%	51.2%410-390 games	48.1#5	L5 +2+2.5+2+2+2.5
Isleworth Court Crushers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 62.5% · Lines 4–5: 64.3% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (28.6%)8 recorded team matches · 3.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%78-80 games · -2 diff. Line 26-275.0%100-70 games · +30 diff. Line 32-528.6%57-82 games · -25 diff. Line 45-271.4%86-73 games · +13 diff. Line 54-357.1%72-78 games · -6 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAmanda NowakCC · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Ashley Appleby · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Kristie Mansilla · 2-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Sanlando Synergy25-20 lines · 50.0% L5 +2+2.5+1+4+3	27.5+3	25-2055.6%	50.0%466-466 games	51.8#4	L5 +2+2.5+1+4+3
Sanlando Synergy · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 52.9% · Lines 4–5: 52.9% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (44.4%)9 recorded team matches · 4 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%75-90 games · -15 diff. Line 25-455.6%84-86 games · -2 diff. Line 35-362.5%92-83 games · +9 diff. Line 44-544.4%94-99 games · -5 diff. Line 55-362.5%93-75 games · +18 diff. Top lower-line contributorsNicole Yarrison · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Alissa Davi · 2-4 on Lines 4–5Caroline Vakhordjian · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↑ 1	Waterford Aces20-20 lines · 49.1% L5 +3+2.5+1+2+2.5	25+2.5	20-2050.0%	49.1%416-432 games	31.5#7	L5 +3+2.5+1+2+2.5
Waterford Aces · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 56.3% · Lines 4–5: 46.2% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (0.0%)8 recorded team matches · 6.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%103-76 games · +27 diff. Line 24-450.0%82-88 games · -6 diff. Line 33-537.5%75-93 games · -18 diff. Line 46-275.0%105-79 games · +26 diff. Line 50-50.0%18-60 games · -42 diff. Top lower-line contributorsPatty Gordon · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Susie Duggins · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Heather Odahowski · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 1	Sanlando Thunder21-24 lines · 49.4% L5 +2+2.5+3+3+1	23.5+1	21-2446.7%	49.4%451-462 games	40.0#6	L5 +2+2.5+3+3+1
Sanlando Thunder · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 22.2% · Lines 4–5: 56.3% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 8 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-722.2%76-108 games · -32 diff. Line 22-722.2%77-108 games · -31 diff. Line 37-277.8%103-66 games · +37 diff. Line 44-544.4%94-98 games · -4 diff. Line 55-271.4%82-58 games · +24 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMiriam Ku · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Kathy Cole · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Kathleen WolkenCC · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	CCO Palm Court Crushers19-26 lines · 48.9% L5 +3+2.5+2+3+1	21.5+1	19-2642.2%	48.9%457-477 games	31.3#8	L5 +3+2.5+2+3+1
CCO Palm Court Crushers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 23.5% · Lines 4–5: 58.8% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 10 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%77-113 games · -36 diff. Line 23-537.5%87-94 games · -7 diff. Line 33-633.3%81-98 games · -17 diff. Line 45-455.6%106-95 games · +11 diff. Line 55-362.5%94-72 games · +22 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLoni Hurbanis · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Rebecca Sos · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Amy Brannen · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	GBC Krush17-28 lines · 47.3% L5 +2+2.5+4+1+1	19.5+1	17-2837.8%	47.3%465-519 games	25.5#9	L5 +2+2.5+4+1+1
GBC Krush · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 72.2% · Lines 4–5: 6.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 12 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%119-110 games · +9 diff. Line 28-188.9%118-73 games · +45 diff. Line 32-625.0%74-104 games · -30 diff. Line 41-712.5%75-100 games · -25 diff. Line 50-80.0%62-111 games · -49 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLisa Millar · 1-5 on Lines 4–5Sarah Best · 1-1 on Lines 4–5Lisa Krause · 0-5 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Heathrow Honey Badgers11-34 lines · 41.4% L5 0+2.5+1+1+2	13.5+2	11-3424.4%	41.4%359-509 games	14.0#10	L5 0+2.5+1+1+2
Heathrow Honey Badgers · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 22.2% · Lines 4–5: 14.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 18 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-633.3%76-85 games · -9 diff. Line 21-811.1%69-115 games · -46 diff. Line 33-633.3%86-100 games · -14 diff. Line 42-722.2%60-106 games · -46 diff. Line 50-50.0%22-61 games · -39 diff. Top lower-line contributorsTracy Sellers · 1-3 on Lines 4–5Shannon McNeill · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Janice Vickaryous · 1-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Isleworth Court CrushersvsHeathrow Overserved

No. 4 meets No. 1, separated by 3.5 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 3-2 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 8-1 this season. Home: Line 1 is 4-4 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 4

Lake Nona LivewiresvsSanlando Synergy

No. 2 meets No. 5, separated by 4 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 0-5 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 6-3 this season. Home: Line 3 is 6-3 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

GBC KrushvsSanlando Thunder

No. 9 meets No. 7, separated by 4 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 3-2 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 7-2 this season. Home: Line 3 is 2-7 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchIsleworth Court Crushers lines won

Isleworth Court Crushers 3, Heathrow Overserved 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Heathrow Overserved	31.5	+2	33.5
Lake Nona Livewires	31.5	+0	31.5
Isleworth Court Crushers	28	+3	31
Sanlando Chargers	28.5	+0	28.5
Sanlando Synergy	27.5	+0	27.5
Waterford Aces	25	+0	25
Sanlando Thunder	23.5	+0	23.5
CCO Palm Court Crushers	21.5	+0	21.5
GBC Krush	19.5	+0	19.5
Heathrow Honey Badgers	13.5	+0	13.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

Sanlando Thunder

Bagel 6-0

Dawn Lang

1198 Elo

Kathleen Wolken

1177 Elo

3 - 66 - 04 - 6

Split Set

Sanlando ChargersUPSET WIN

Bernadette Jakubowski

1124 Elo

Carol Muscato

1088 Elo

Match context for Sanlando Thunder and Sanlando Chargers
Sanlando Thunder	Metric	Sanlando Chargers
62%	Pre-match win chance	38%
-34	Pair rating change	+22

Rating details

Match context for Sanlando Thunder and Sanlando Chargers
Sanlando Thunder	Metric	Sanlando Chargers
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 4 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Sanlando Chargers is 3 points behind first.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

CCO Palm Court CrushersWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Christy Cisneros

1223 Elo

Loni Hurbanis

1208 Elo

6 - 17 - 6

Straight Sets

Lake Nona Livewires

Tara Marvin

1217 Elo

Susan Capone

1177 Elo

Match context for CCO Palm Court Crushers and Lake Nona Livewires
CCO Palm Court Crushers	Metric	Lake Nona Livewires
53%	Pre-match win chance	47%
+34	Pair rating change	-22

Rating details

Match context for CCO Palm Court Crushers and Lake Nona Livewires
CCO Palm Court Crushers	Metric	Lake Nona Livewires
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Heathrow Overserved

Lauren Brooke

1252 Elo

Jeanne Janas

1160 Elo

7 - 65 - 72 - 6

Split Set

GBC KrushWIN

Casey Parker

1318 Elo

Denika Williams

1301 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Overserved and GBC Krush
Heathrow Overserved	Metric	GBC Krush
36%	Pre-match win chance	64%
-12	Pair rating change	+12

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Overserved and GBC Krush
Heathrow Overserved	Metric	GBC Krush
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

Heathrow OverservedWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Cecilia McClure

1179 Elo

Anne Rue

1162 Elo

7 - 61 - 66 - 1

Split Set

GBC Krush

Breadstick 6-1

Lisa Krause

1126 Elo

Kay Moore

1087 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Overserved and GBC Krush
Heathrow Overserved	Metric	GBC Krush
59%	Pre-match win chance	41%
+14	Pair rating change	-14

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Overserved and GBC Krush
Heathrow Overserved	Metric	GBC Krush
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 4 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, 0 points separate the top two teams.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Heathrow Overserved	89%8-1	38%3-5	89%8-1	56%5-4	56%5-4
Lake Nona Livewires	38%3-5	78%7-2	67%6-3	78%7-2	75%6-2
Sanlando Chargers	89%8-1	44%4-5	38%3-5	44%4-5	78%7-2
Isleworth Court Crushers	50%4-4	75%6-2	29%2-5	71%5-2	57%4-3
Sanlando Synergy	50%4-4	56%5-4	63%5-3	44%4-5	63%5-3
Waterford Aces	63%5-3	50%4-4	38%3-5	75%6-2	0%0-5
Sanlando Thunder	22%2-7	22%2-7	78%7-2	44%4-5	71%5-2
CCO Palm Court Crushers	11%1-8	38%3-5	33%3-6	56%5-4	63%5-3
GBC Krush	56%5-4	89%8-1	25%2-6	13%1-7	0%0-8
Heathrow Honey Badgers	33%3-6	11%1-8	33%3-6	22%2-7	0%0-5

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs