WAIT Women’s B1 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s B1 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 10 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

The lead grew by 1 this round, to 0.5 points. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1↑ 1	Azalea One Love37-8 lines · 60.6% L5 +3+2.5+5+4+5	39.5+5	37-882.2%	60.6%533-346 games	74.2#2	L5 +3+2.5+5+4+5
Azalea One Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 100.0% · Lines 4–5: 66.7% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 19-0100.0%117-48 games · +69 diff. Line 29-0100.0%108-53 games · +55 diff. Line 37-277.8%107-80 games · +27 diff. Line 45-455.6%92-97 games · -5 diff. Line 57-277.8%109-68 games · +41 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJennifer McGaffic · 6-3 on Lines 4–5Lauren Ayers · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Marquita Shiever · 4-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↓ 1	Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet34-6 lines · 68.4% L5 +2+2.5+5+5+4	39+4	34-685.0%	68.4%480-222 games	83.5#1	L5 +2+2.5+5+5+4
Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 87.5% · Lines 4–5: 80.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (75.0%)8 recorded team matches · 0.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-187.5%96-38 games · +58 diff. Line 27-187.5%95-47 games · +48 diff. Line 38-0100.0%97-40 games · +57 diff. Line 46-275.0%99-56 games · +43 diff. Line 56-185.7%85-31 games · +54 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMercedes Kuri · 6-2 on Lines 4–5Adrienne Ransom · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Jenny Perdue · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3	Waterford Warriors35-10 lines · 59.9% L5 +3+2.5+4+5+4	37.5+4	35-1077.8%	59.9%544-364 games	72.6#3	L5 +3+2.5+4+5+4
Waterford Warriors · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 77.8% · Lines 4–5: 76.5% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (62.5%)9 recorded team matches · 2 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-277.8%109-82 games · +27 diff. Line 27-277.8%113-65 games · +48 diff. Line 37-277.8%113-68 games · +45 diff. Line 48-188.9%111-75 games · +36 diff. Line 55-362.5%88-66 games · +22 diff. Top lower-line contributorsTricia Carpenter · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Tiffany Ardizzone · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Gail Burr · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4	Interlachen Country Club31-14 lines · 57.3% L5 +5+2.5+1+1+3	33.5+3	31-1468.9%	57.3%513-382 games	62.4#4	L5 +5+2.5+1+1+3
Interlachen Country Club · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 52.9% · Lines 4–5: 72.2% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (50.0%)9 recorded team matches · 6 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%87-81 games · +6 diff. Line 25-455.6%100-85 games · +15 diff. Line 38-188.9%115-74 games · +41 diff. Line 47-277.8%100-66 games · +34 diff. Line 56-366.7%104-75 games · +29 diff. Top lower-line contributorsCaitlin Yarbrough · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Sarah Tomlinson · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Meg Dolan · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Winter Park the B Team18-22 lines · 47.9% L5 0+2.5+4+40	23	18-2245.0%	47.9%387-421 games	38.2#5	L5 0+2.5+4+40
Winter Park the B Team · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 31.3% · Lines 4–5: 53.3% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (25.0%)8 recorded team matches · 16.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%64-78 games · -14 diff. Line 22-625.0%89-107 games · -18 diff. Line 34-450.0%88-83 games · +5 diff. Line 44-357.1%79-76 games · +3 diff. Line 54-450.0%67-77 games · -10 diff. Top lower-line contributorsRebekkah Parlee · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Nicole CarterC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Michele Salmon · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Fort Gatlin Alley Girls18-27 lines · 46.2% L5 +5+2.5+4+1+1	20.5+1	18-2740.0%	46.2%372-434 games	30.4#6	L5 +5+2.5+4+1+1
Fort Gatlin Alley Girls · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 55.6% · Lines 4–5: 35.3% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 19 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%89-75 games · +14 diff. Line 25-455.6%74-84 games · -10 diff. Line 31-811.1%57-100 games · -43 diff. Line 43-633.3%90-92 games · -2 diff. Line 53-537.5%62-83 games · -21 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMelissa GrahamCC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Eileen Schiffer · 2-5 on Lines 4–5Christine Nursey · 2-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↑ 1	OTC Tough Love15-30 lines · 40.6% L5 +2+2.50+1+2	17.5+2	15-3033.3%	40.6%309-453 games	27.4#8	L5 +2+2.50+1+2
OTC Tough Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 16.7% · Lines 4–5: 52.9% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 22 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%48-110 games · -62 diff. Line 22-722.2%51-90 games · -39 diff. Line 33-633.3%69-90 games · -21 diff. Line 44-450.0%70-73 games · -3 diff. Line 55-455.6%71-90 games · -19 diff. Top lower-line contributorsSusan Godorov · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Tracy McLaughlin · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Carol Schmid · 2-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8↓ 1	Red Bug Seeing Doubles14-31 lines · 44.0% L5 +3+2.5+1+4+1	16.5+1	14-3131.1%	44.0%381-484 games	28.4#7	L5 +3+2.5+1+4+1
Red Bug Seeing Doubles · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 22.2% · Lines 4–5: 44.4% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 23 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-722.2%57-106 games · -49 diff. Line 22-722.2%76-112 games · -36 diff. Line 32-722.2%79-99 games · -20 diff. Line 44-544.4%82-87 games · -5 diff. Line 54-544.4%87-80 games · +7 diff. Top lower-line contributorsEma Lou · 3-4 on Lines 4–5Jane Moorhead · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Alaine Kaminsky · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#9	Tuscawilla Shot Sisters9-36 lines · 38.3% L5 +2+2.5+10+2	11.5+2	9-3620.0%	38.3%315-508 games	14.2#10	L5 +2+2.5+10+2
Tuscawilla Shot Sisters · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 38.9% · Lines 4–5: 5.9% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 28 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-544.4%77-79 games · -2 diff. Line 23-633.3%65-98 games · -33 diff. Line 31-811.1%48-108 games · -60 diff. Line 40-90.0%61-118 games · -57 diff. Line 51-712.5%64-105 games · -41 diff. Top lower-line contributorsOdette Nimmo · 1-5 on Lines 4–5Nancy Hopkins · 1-2 on Lines 4–5Ann PenningtonCC · 0-7 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#10	Azalea Reeds9-36 lines · 35.6% L5 0+2.500+3	11.5+3	9-3620.0%	35.6%272-492 games	17.5#9	L5 0+2.500+3
Azalea Reeds · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 17.6% · Lines 4–5: 16.7% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 28 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-712.5%42-89 games · -47 diff. Line 22-722.2%66-96 games · -30 diff. Line 33-633.3%57-88 games · -31 diff. Line 42-722.2%63-107 games · -44 diff. Line 51-811.1%43-105 games · -62 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLibby Cowart · 1-5 on Lines 4–5Eve Koch · 1-5 on Lines 4–5Tammy Wacker · 1-4 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Azalea One LovevsRed Bug Seeing Doubles

No. 1 meets No. 8, separated by 23 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 4-1 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 4-5 this season. Home: Line 4 is 5-4 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

OTC Tough LovevsFort Gatlin Alley Girls

No. 7 meets No. 6, separated by 3 points. Winning 5 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 5-4 this season. Home: Line 1 is 1-8 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Waterford WarriorsvsWinter Park the B Team

No. 3 meets No. 5, separated by 14.5 points.

Last meeting: Sep 2: 5-0 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 5-3 this season. Home: Line 4 is 8-1 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchAzalea One Love lines won

Azalea One Love 3, Red Bug Seeing Doubles 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Azalea One Love	39.5	+3	42.5
Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet	39	+0	39
Waterford Warriors	37.5	+0	37.5
Interlachen Country Club	33.5	+0	33.5
Winter Park the B Team	23	+0	23
Fort Gatlin Alley Girls	20.5	+0	20.5
Red Bug Seeing Doubles	16.5	+2	18.5
OTC Tough Love	17.5	+0	17.5
Azalea Reeds	11.5	+0	11.5
Tuscawilla Shot Sisters	11.5	+0	11.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

Red Bug Seeing DoublesUPSET WIN

Breadstick 6-1

Carol Dean

1159 Elo

Amy Wydra

1188 Elo

7 - 66 - 1

Straight Sets

Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet

Sandra Zini

1228 Elo

Lynn Logalbo

1227 Elo

Match context for Red Bug Seeing Doubles and Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet
Red Bug Seeing Doubles	Metric	Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet
42%	Pre-match win chance	58%
+28	Pair rating change	-56

Rating details

Match context for Red Bug Seeing Doubles and Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet
Red Bug Seeing Doubles	Metric	Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

The winning team’s only point in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Fort Gatlin Alley Girls

Ronda Stingley

1194 Elo

Pamela Mellerick Shaw

1129 Elo

0 - 60 - 6

Straight Sets

Waterford WarriorsWIN

Bagel 6-0

Patricia Wubker

1296 Elo

Lori Burshan

1281 Elo

Match context for Fort Gatlin Alley Girls and Waterford Warriors
Fort Gatlin Alley Girls	Metric	Waterford Warriors
32%	Pre-match win chance	68%
-42	Pair rating change	+22

Rating details

Match context for Fort Gatlin Alley Girls and Waterford Warriors
Fort Gatlin Alley Girls	Metric	Waterford Warriors
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 4 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Waterford Warriors is 2 points behind first.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

Interlachen Country Club

Alexis Hall

1245 Elo

Courtney Maloney

1235 Elo

7 - 63 - 63 - 6

Split Set

OTC Tough LoveUPSET WIN

Laura Foster

1230 Elo

Shani Monk

1226 Elo

Match context for Interlachen Country Club and OTC Tough Love
Interlachen Country Club	Metric	OTC Tough Love
52%	Pre-match win chance	48%
-18	Pair rating change	+28

Rating details

Match context for Interlachen Country Club and OTC Tough Love
Interlachen Country Club	Metric	OTC Tough Love
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

Tuscawilla Shot Sisters

Breadstick 6-1

Ann Pennington

1133 Elo

Hallie Johnson

1104 Elo

6 - 11 - 64 - 6

Split Set

Azalea ReedsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Tammy Wacker

1097 Elo

Sharon Littman

1172 Elo

Match context for Tuscawilla Shot Sisters and Azalea Reeds
Tuscawilla Shot Sisters	Metric	Azalea Reeds
48%	Pre-match win chance	52%
-18	Pair rating change	+26

Rating details

Match context for Tuscawilla Shot Sisters and Azalea Reeds
Tuscawilla Shot Sisters	Metric	Azalea Reeds
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 10 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Azalea One Love	100%9-0	100%9-0	78%7-2	56%5-4	78%7-2
Red Bug Always Causing a Racquet	88%7-1	88%7-1	100%8-0	75%6-2	86%6-1
Waterford Warriors	78%7-2	78%7-2	78%7-2	89%8-1	63%5-3
Interlachen Country Club	50%4-4	56%5-4	89%8-1	78%7-2	67%6-3
Winter Park the B Team	38%3-5	25%2-6	50%4-4	57%4-3	50%4-4
Fort Gatlin Alley Girls	56%5-4	56%5-4	11%1-8	33%3-6	38%3-5
OTC Tough Love	11%1-8	22%2-7	33%3-6	50%4-4	56%5-4
Red Bug Seeing Doubles	22%2-7	22%2-7	22%2-7	44%4-5	44%4-5
Tuscawilla Shot Sisters	44%4-5	33%3-6	11%1-8	0%0-9	13%1-7
Azalea Reeds	13%1-7	22%2-7	33%3-6	22%2-7	11%1-8

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs