WAIT Women’s B3 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s B3 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 8 teams

Results through Oct 28

The race right now

The gap is down to 4 points after second place gained 1 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	USTA Serves You Right34-11 lines · 63.4% L5 +3+2.5+2+5+4	36.5+4	34-1175.6%	63.4%489-282 games	70.7#1	L5 +3+2.5+2+5+4
USTA Serves You Right · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 88.2% · Lines 4–5: 55.6% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 19-0100.0%111-42 games · +69 diff. Line 26-275.0%97-63 games · +34 diff. Line 38-0100.0%97-29 games · +68 diff. Line 45-455.6%95-76 games · +19 diff. Line 55-455.6%89-72 games · +17 diff. Top lower-line contributorsPiper Mandigo · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Liesje Dixon · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Whitney Bongiorno · 3-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2↑ 2	Geneva Court Queens30-15 lines · 56.9% L5 +3+2.5+3+3+5	32.5+5	30-1566.7%	56.9%461-349 games	63.3#2	L5 +3+2.5+3+3+5
Geneva Court Queens · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 61.1% · Lines 4–5: 77.8% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (55.6%)9 recorded team matches · 4 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%89-84 games · +5 diff. Line 26-366.7%93-77 games · +16 diff. Line 35-455.6%79-68 games · +11 diff. Line 47-277.8%99-63 games · +36 diff. Line 57-277.8%101-57 games · +44 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJaynee ThompsonC · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Justine Cascante · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Malvina Maynard · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3↓ 1	Interlachen Country Club29-16 lines · 55.4% L5 +5+2.5+5+4+1	31.5+1	29-1664.4%	55.4%468-377 games	56.6#3	L5 +5+2.5+5+4+1
Interlachen Country Club · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 52.9% · Lines 4–5: 72.2% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 16-366.7%100-75 games · +25 diff. Line 23-537.5%82-91 games · -9 diff. Line 36-275.0%84-60 games · +24 diff. Line 46-366.7%96-69 games · +27 diff. Line 57-277.8%106-82 games · +24 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAndi Kroll · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Massie Wanzenberg · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Nell Gonzalez · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4↓ 1	OTC Double Shots29-16 lines · 54.8% L5 +2+2.5+3+2+3	31.5+3	29-1664.4%	54.8%482-397 games	54.5#4	L5 +2+2.5+3+2+3
OTC Double Shots · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 76.5% · Lines 4–5: 55.6% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (33.3%)9 recorded team matches · 5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%75-59 games · +16 diff. Line 28-188.9%109-61 games · +48 diff. Line 35-455.6%89-91 games · -2 diff. Line 43-633.3%90-91 games · -1 diff. Line 57-277.8%109-87 games · +22 diff. Top lower-line contributorsBrittnie Faine · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Ashley Bernstein · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Elena BeanCC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5↑ 2	Sanlando Blast18-27 lines · 44.7% L5 +4+2.5+2+1+3	20.5+3	18-2740.0%	44.7%417-516 games	30.8#7	L5 +4+2.5+2+1+3
Sanlando Blast · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 35.3% · Lines 4–5: 35.3% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (12.5%)9 recorded team matches · 16 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-625.0%68-98 games · -30 diff. Line 24-544.4%78-96 games · -18 diff. Line 35-455.6%95-98 games · -3 diff. Line 45-455.6%78-82 games · -4 diff. Line 51-712.5%78-115 games · -37 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKristin Klinger · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Rebecca Veigle · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Jennifer Carr · 1-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6↓ 1	Red Bug Blazing Aces18-27 lines · 47.7% L5 +2+2.50+4+2	20.5+2	18-2740.0%	47.7%421-461 games	34.7#5	L5 +2+2.50+4+2
Red Bug Blazing Aces · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 55.6% · Lines 4–5: 27.8% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 16 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-455.6%87-78 games · +9 diff. Line 25-455.6%81-77 games · +4 diff. Line 33-633.3%74-90 games · -16 diff. Line 43-633.3%89-109 games · -20 diff. Line 52-722.2%90-107 games · -17 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKim Catron · 3-3 on Lines 4–5Amy Orne · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Linda Zucker · 1-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7↓ 1	Heathrow Hit Squad17-28 lines · 44.5% L5 +1+2.5+5+1+2	19.5+2	17-2837.8%	44.5%380-474 games	32.5#6	L5 +1+2.5+5+1+2
Heathrow Hit Squad · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 27.8% · Lines 4–5: 52.9% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (22.2%)9 recorded team matches · 17 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-633.3%60-94 games · -34 diff. Line 22-722.2%90-103 games · -13 diff. Line 32-722.2%69-99 games · -30 diff. Line 44-544.4%71-95 games · -24 diff. Line 55-362.5%78-67 games · +11 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKatrina Weaver · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Annette Haley WilliamsC · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Donna BradfordCC · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	USTA Racquet Science5-40 lines · 33.7% L5 0+2.5000	6.5−1 adj.	5-4011.1%	33.7%270-532 games	7.8#8	L5 0+2.5000
USTA Racquet Science · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 5.6% · Lines 4–5: 18.8% · Weakest Line: Line 1 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 30 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 10-90.0%54-114 games · -60 diff. Line 21-811.1%50-112 games · -62 diff. Line 31-811.1%49-101 games · -52 diff. Line 43-633.3%63-96 games · -33 diff. Line 50-70.0%21-85 games · -64 diff. Top lower-line contributorsLeslie Sanders · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Mary Dolohanty · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Kristie Munro · 0-6 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 4

Heathrow Hit SquadvsUSTA Serves You Right

No. 7 meets No. 1, separated by 17 points.

Last meeting: Sep 16: 1-4 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 9-0 this season. Home: Line 1 is 3-6 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Interlachen Country ClubvsGeneva Court Queens

No. 3 meets No. 2, separated by 1 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Sep 16: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 4 is 7-2 this season. Home: Line 4 is 6-3 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 4

Red Bug Blazing AcesvsOTC Double Shots

No. 6 meets No. 4, separated by 11 points.

Last meeting: Sep 16: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 8-1 this season. Home: Line 2 is 5-4 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchHeathrow Hit Squad lines won

Heathrow Hit Squad 3, USTA Serves You Right 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
USTA Serves You Right	36.5	+2	38.5
Geneva Court Queens	32.5	+0	32.5
Interlachen Country Club	31.5	+0	31.5
OTC Double Shots	31.5	+0	31.5
Heathrow Hit Squad	19.5	+3	22.5
Red Bug Blazing Aces	20.5	+0	20.5
Sanlando Blast	20.5	+0	20.5
USTA Racquet Science	6.5	+0	6.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Oct 28

Biggest Upset

Line 5

Oct 28Line 5

OTC Double Shots

Brittnie Faine

1255 Elo

Abigail Roofner

1232 Elo

4 - 62 - 6

Straight Sets

Heathrow Hit SquadUPSET WIN

Elyse Kwiatkowski

1165 Elo

Chelsy Corning

1156 Elo

Match context for OTC Double Shots and Heathrow Hit Squad
OTC Double Shots	Metric	Heathrow Hit Squad
62%	Pre-match win chance	38%
-44	Pair rating change	+30

Rating details

Match context for OTC Double Shots and Heathrow Hit Squad
OTC Double Shots	Metric	Heathrow Hit Squad
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Oct 28Line 1

Geneva Court QueensWIN

Bagel 6-0Breadstick 6-1

Julia Patenaude

1278 Elo

Emelly Carmean

1259 Elo

6 - 16 - 0

Straight Sets

USTA Racquet Science

Irma Jimenez

1106 Elo

Darcy Cobb

1122 Elo

Match context for Geneva Court Queens and USTA Racquet Science
Geneva Court Queens	Metric	USTA Racquet Science
71%	Pre-match win chance	29%
+18	Pair rating change	-28

Rating details

Match context for Geneva Court Queens and USTA Racquet Science
Geneva Court Queens	Metric	USTA Racquet Science
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 5 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Geneva Court Queens is 4 points behind first.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 4

Oct 28Line 4

OTC Double Shots

Bagel 6-0

Lisa Edwards

1200 Elo

Elena Bean

1206 Elo

6 - 03 - 65 - 7

Split Set

Heathrow Hit SquadWIN

Katrina Weaver

1220 Elo

Annette Haley Williams

1203 Elo

Match context for OTC Double Shots and Heathrow Hit Squad
OTC Double Shots	Metric	Heathrow Hit Squad
49%	Pre-match win chance	51%
-18	Pair rating change	+18

Rating details

Match context for OTC Double Shots and Heathrow Hit Squad
OTC Double Shots	Metric	Heathrow Hit Squad
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 2

Oct 28Line 2

Sanlando Blast

Brenda Kouwenhoven

1223 Elo

Laurie Olberding

1218 Elo

6 - 23 - 63 - 6

Split Set

Red Bug Blazing AcesWIN

Chandy Kelley

1223 Elo

Emily Noel

1220 Elo

Match context for Sanlando Blast and Red Bug Blazing Aces
Sanlando Blast	Metric	Red Bug Blazing Aces
50%	Pre-match win chance	50%
-18	Pair rating change	+18

Rating details

Match context for Sanlando Blast and Red Bug Blazing Aces
Sanlando Blast	Metric	Red Bug Blazing Aces
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 8 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
USTA Serves You Right	100%9-0	75%6-2	100%8-0	56%5-4	56%5-4
Geneva Court Queens	56%5-4	67%6-3	56%5-4	78%7-2	78%7-2
Interlachen Country Club	67%6-3	38%3-5	75%6-2	67%6-3	78%7-2
OTC Double Shots	63%5-3	89%8-1	56%5-4	33%3-6	78%7-2
Sanlando Blast	25%2-6	44%4-5	56%5-4	56%5-4	13%1-7
Red Bug Blazing Aces	56%5-4	56%5-4	33%3-6	33%3-6	22%2-7
Heathrow Hit Squad	33%3-6	22%2-7	22%2-7	44%4-5	63%5-3
USTA Racquet Science	0%0-9	11%1-8	11%1-8	33%3-6	0%0-7

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT A/B · 2026-27

Do we have to play a full third set?

Not always. All four players can agree to a 10-point substitute for a normal or early-start match. If the third set begins at or after 1 p.m., the 10-point tiebreak is required.

Rule II.C, p. 4

How does the Coman change of ends work?

Change ends after the first point, then after every four more points: after points 1, 5, 9 and 13, continuing that pattern. The set tiebreak is first to seven, with a two-point margin.

Rule II.D, p. 4

Can a WAIT C player substitute in A/B?

Yes, if she is on the approved substitute list and satisfies the applicable restrictions. Her application and fee must arrive by Monday before the match, and Membership authorization must be received before play.

Rules I.A.5 and I.A.5.e, pp. 2-3

All rules & FAQs