WAIT Women’s C-2 | Division Standings

WAIT Women’s C-2 Division Standings

2026-2027 · 8 teams

Results through Nov 3

The race right now

The gap is down to 6.5 points after second place gained 0.5 this round. More

Rank	Team	PTSLines won	Lines W-L	Games won %	Roster Depth Index	Last 5
#1	Maitland Overserved29-8 lines · 64.0% L5 +2.5+4+4+5+2.5	35.5+2.5	29-878.4%	64.0%403-227 games	73.4#1	L5 +2.5+4+4+5+2.5
Maitland Overserved · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 75.0% · Lines 4–5: 84.6% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (62.5%)8 recorded team matches · 0 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-187.5%90-36 games · +54 diff. Line 25-362.5%76-69 games · +7 diff. Line 35-271.4%79-51 games · +28 diff. Line 46-185.7%83-39 games · +44 diff. Line 55-183.3%63-29 games · +34 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAlicia ThackerCC · 5-0 on Lines 4–5Brittney Donovan · 5-0 on Lines 4–5Christina Curran · 3-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#2	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings26-18 lines · 54.4% L5 +2.5+1+1+4+3	29+3	26-1859.1%	54.4%466-390 games	53.3#2	L5 +2.5+1+1+4+3
Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 70.6% · Lines 4–5: 61.1% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 6.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 15-362.5%72-57 games · +15 diff. Line 27-277.8%107-63 games · +44 diff. Line 33-537.5%73-97 games · -24 diff. Line 44-544.4%114-96 games · +18 diff. Line 57-277.8%97-71 games · +26 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMargaret Holt · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Judy French-ScottC · 5-1 on Lines 4–5Carol Lynn Reiss · 3-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#3	Red Bug Racquettes25-19 lines · 51.9% L5 +2.5+1+4+3+3	28+3	25-1956.8%	51.9%438-406 games	46.2#4	L5 +2.5+1+4+3+3
Red Bug Racquettes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 31.3% · Lines 4–5: 64.7% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (25.0%)9 recorded team matches · 7.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 13-537.5%76-89 games · -13 diff. Line 22-625.0%72-94 games · -22 diff. Line 37-187.5%103-56 games · +47 diff. Line 48-188.9%109-67 games · +42 diff. Line 53-537.5%68-95 games · -27 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKathryn Kimball · 5-2 on Lines 4–5Anne Marie Prucha · 4-1 on Lines 4–5Nancy Cooper · 3-0 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#4	Lake Nona Love22-18 lines · 51.2% L5 +2.5+3+3+2+2.5	27+2.5	22-1855.0%	51.2%397-379 games	49.7#3	L5 +2.5+3+3+2+2.5
Lake Nona Love · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 68.8% · Lines 4–5: 40.0% · Weakest Line: Line 4 (37.5%)8 recorded team matches · 8.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%75-75 games · 0 diff. Line 27-187.5%91-48 games · +43 diff. Line 34-357.1%71-75 games · -4 diff. Line 43-537.5%80-97 games · -17 diff. Line 53-442.9%68-79 games · -11 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAnnette Zielinski · 3-2 on Lines 4–5Anna Soloveychik · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Jessenia de Jesus · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#5	Interlachen Country Club-Bellinkoff22-20 lines · 51.3% L5 +2.5+3+4+2+2.5	26+2.5	22-2052.4%	51.3%470-446 games	42.6#6	L5 +2.5+3+4+2+2.5
Interlachen Country Club-Bellinkoff · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 82.4% · Lines 4–5: 26.7% · Weakest Line: Line 5 (12.5%)9 recorded team matches · 9.5 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 17-187.5%92-53 games · +39 diff. Line 27-277.8%120-97 games · +23 diff. Line 34-357.1%78-79 games · -1 diff. Line 43-442.9%73-87 games · -14 diff. Line 51-712.5%84-106 games · -22 diff. Top lower-line contributorsMegan Vietor · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Brittany McDaniel · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Ingrid Cordell · 2-1 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#6	Sanlando Racquettes23-22 lines · 50.7% L5 +2.5+2+1+3+2	25.5+2	23-2251.1%	50.7%423-412 games	46.1#5	L5 +2.5+2+1+3+2
Sanlando Racquettes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 50.0% · Lines 4–5: 55.6% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (37.5%)9 recorded team matches · 10 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 14-450.0%75-81 games · -6 diff. Line 24-450.0%81-76 games · +5 diff. Line 33-537.5%86-85 games · +1 diff. Line 44-544.4%78-92 games · -14 diff. Line 56-366.7%93-70 games · +23 diff. Top lower-line contributorsJanet Gibson · 5-3 on Lines 4–5Kim Tamoney · 3-0 on Lines 4–5Karen Arbutine · 2-3 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#7	Heathrow Racquettes17-28 lines · 44.1% L5 +3+4+20+2	19.5+2	17-2837.8%	44.1%387-490 games	28.4#7	L5 +3+4+20+2
Heathrow Racquettes · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 16.7% · Lines 4–5: 44.4% · Weakest Line: Line 2 (11.1%)9 recorded team matches · 16 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 12-722.2%58-100 games · -42 diff. Line 21-811.1%63-110 games · -47 diff. Line 34-357.1%80-74 games · +6 diff. Line 45-455.6%104-99 games · +5 diff. Line 53-633.3%75-101 games · -26 diff. Top lower-line contributorsKrista DuseyCC · 3-1 on Lines 4–5Jennifer Laudato · 2-2 on Lines 4–5Cerese Van Hooven · 2-2 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.
#8	Lake Cane Sugar & Slice7-38 lines · 35.8% L5 +2+2+1+1+2.5	9.5+2.5	7-3815.6%	35.8%294-528 games	10.1#8	L5 +2+2+1+1+2.5
Lake Cane Sugar & Slice · Roster Depth IndexLines 1–2: 11.1% · Lines 4–5: 21.4% · Weakest Line: Line 3 (0.0%)9 recorded team matches · 26 points behind the reported leaderOpen team clubhouse Line 11-811.1%62-109 games · -47 diff. Line 21-811.1%53-106 games · -53 diff. Line 30-80.0%57-110 games · -53 diff. Line 40-80.0%34-98 games · -64 diff. Line 53-350.0%62-59 games · +3 diff. Top lower-line contributorsAlana Drannikova · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Susan Cogswell · 2-3 on Lines 4–5Jeannie TriolaC · 1-5 on Lines 4–5 The Roster Depth Index rewards wins across the lineup, with extra attention to the weakest line. Higher is better. All five lines need results; defaults and missing scores are excluded.

Matches to watch

All team matches →

Nov 10

Red Bug RacquettesvsMaitland Overserved

No. 3 meets No. 1, separated by 7.5 points.

Last meeting: Oct 6: 2.5-2.5 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 1 is 7-1 this season. Home: Line 1 is 3-5 across 8 recorded results.

Nov 10

Interlachen Country Club-BellinkoffvsLake Nona Love

No. 5 meets No. 4, separated by 1 points. Winning 4 of 5 lines would put the trailing team ahead on points, with other totals unchanged.

Last meeting: Oct 6: 2.5-2.5 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 2 is 7-1 this season. Home: Line 2 is 7-2 across 9 recorded results.

Nov 10

Lake Cane Sugar & SlicevsHeathrow Racquettes

No. 8 meets No. 7, separated by 10 points. Adjacent in the reported standings.

Last meeting: Oct 6: 2-3 points (home-away).

Watch: Away: Line 3 is 5-3 this season. Home: Line 3 is 1-8 across 9 recorded results.

Based on the retained schedule and reported standings. Outstanding results can change the gaps.

What would this score change?

Try a line score for one upcoming team match. All other teams keep their currently reported points.

Team matchRed Bug Racquettes lines won

Red Bug Racquettes 3, Maitland Overserved 2.

Team	Reported points	Added	Hypothetical total
Maitland Overserved	35.5	+2	37.5
Red Bug Racquettes	28	+3	31
Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings	29	+0	29
Lake Nona Love	27	+0	27
Interlachen Country Club-Bellinkoff	26	+0	26
Sanlando Racquettes	25.5	+0	25.5
Heathrow Racquettes	19.5	+0	19.5
Lake Cane Sugar & Slice	9.5	+0	9.5

An illustration using one point per line, without defaults, adjustments or results from other matches. Ordered by points only; official tiebreaks and qualification rules are not applied. This does not change recorded results.

Weekly Match Highlights

Nov 3

Biggest Upset

Line 4

Nov 3Line 4

Heathrow RacquettesUPSET WIN

Krista Dusey

1181 Elo

Kathryn Liden

1078 Elo

3 - 66 - 47 - 5

Split Set

Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings

Suelene Phipps

1175 Elo

Allyson Peters

1245 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
39%	Pre-match win chance	61%
+22	Pair rating change	-34

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View all upset wins →View match

Bagel / Breadstick

Line 1

Nov 3Line 1

Heathrow Racquettes

Jennifer Cipparone

1139 Elo

Johanna Weiss

1152 Elo

3 - 61 - 6

Straight Sets

Ft. Gatlin Wild StringsWIN

Breadstick 6-1

Cathy Driggers

1201 Elo

Sylvia Nelson

1201 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
42%	Pre-match win chance	58%
-28	Pair rating change	+28

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings is 6.5 points behind first.

View match

Split-Set Thriller

Line 2

Nov 3Line 2

Heathrow Racquettes

Anna Kiss

1126 Elo

Lisa Nupp-Hayden

1224 Elo

6 - 42 - 63 - 6

Split Set

Ft. Gatlin Wild StringsWIN

Kerrie Chambers

1316 Elo

Linda I'Anson

1147 Elo

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
42%	Pre-match win chance	58%
-22	Pair rating change	+16

Rating details

Match context for Heathrow Racquettes and Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
Heathrow Racquettes	Metric	Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 3 points taken in this team match. In the reported standings, Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings is 6.5 points behind first.

View match

Closest Contest

Line 1

Nov 3Line 1

Sanlando RacquettesWIN

Anne Dibble

1231 Elo

Debbie String

1198 Elo

6 - 46 - 3

Straight Sets

Red Bug Racquettes

Raana Ghanadpour

1215 Elo

Jill McLaughlin

1174 Elo

Match context for Sanlando Racquettes and Red Bug Racquettes
Sanlando Racquettes	Metric	Red Bug Racquettes
53%	Pre-match win chance	47%
+22	Pair rating change	-22

Rating details

Match context for Sanlando Racquettes and Red Bug Racquettes
Sanlando Racquettes	Metric	Red Bug Racquettes
	Pair Elo before
	Pair Elo after

Pair ratings add both players’ ratings together. Pair rating change is their combined change, not each player’s individual change.

One of 2 points taken in this team match.

View match

Team Line Performance

Win %

All 8 league teams · Line-by-line results

Team	Line 1	Line 2	Line 3	Line 4	Line 5
Maitland Overserved	88%7-1	63%5-3	71%5-2	86%6-1	83%5-1
Ft. Gatlin Wild Strings	63%5-3	78%7-2	38%3-5	44%4-5	78%7-2
Red Bug Racquettes	38%3-5	25%2-6	88%7-1	89%8-1	38%3-5
Lake Nona Love	50%4-4	88%7-1	57%4-3	38%3-5	43%3-4
Interlachen Country Club-Bellinkoff	88%7-1	78%7-2	57%4-3	43%3-4	13%1-7
Sanlando Racquettes	50%4-4	50%4-4	38%3-5	44%4-5	67%6-3
Heathrow Racquettes	22%2-7	11%1-8	57%4-3	56%5-4	33%3-6
Lake Cane Sugar & Slice	11%1-8	11%1-8	0%0-8	0%0-8	50%3-3

Above 50%At 50%Below 50%

Line Strength

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Line Movement

Loads as you scroll, or open it now.

Rules & FAQs

WAIT C · 2026-27

Can a flagged player move lower as soon as she loses her third match?

No. Her captain must request the change through Membership and receive confirmation. Until then, her current flag still controls her position.

Part I, Rules 1.D.3 and 1.E, p. 4

Are games won the first standings tiebreak?

No. For a tie in the top three places, WAIT C first compares head-to-head league points. Sets and then games are the next comparisons. EloCup’s independent Elo rating is not an official league tiebreak.

Part I, Rule 14.B, p. 14

Can one pair insist on a ten-point tiebreak instead of a full third set?

No. The published WAIT C format requires all four players to agree to the replacement. Confirm the agreement before using it; otherwise follow the normal best-of-three-set format.

Part II, Section B.1.A-B, p. 5; Section C.2, p. 16

All rules & FAQs